context, we may refer to a recent decision of
this Court in Kunhayammed v. State of Kerala
(three Judges)".
40. In terms ... paras 39
to 44. We reproduce the same hereunder: (Kunh
ayammed case [ Kunhayammed v. State of
Kerala
peculiar facts, with no discussion on any principle of law, whereas
Kunhayammed is an elaborate discourse based on well accepted
propositions of law which ... issue. We
are, therefore, of the view that detailed judgment in
Kunhayammed lays down the correct law and there is no need to
refer
peculiar facts, with no discussion on any principle of law, whereas
Kunhayammed is an elaborate discourse based on well accepted
propositions of law which ... issue. We
are, therefore, of the view that detailed judgment in
Kunhayammed lays down the correct law and there is no need to
refer
peculiar facts, with no discussion on any principle of law,
whereas Kunhayammed is an elaborate discourse based on well
accepted propositions of law which ... issue. We are, therefore, of the view that detailed judgment in
Kunhayammed lays down the correct law and there is no need
to refer
Abbai Maligai Partnership Firm v. K. Santhakumaran , ( 1998) 7
SCC 386 and Kunhayammed vs. State of Kerala , (2000) 6 SCC
359 held that in case ... peculiar facts, with no
discussion on any principle of law, whereas Kunhayammed is an
elaborate discourse based on well accepted propositions of law
which
this contention is valid.
23. As pointed out by this Court in Kunhayammed v. State of
Kerala3 , there is a distinction between the dismissal ... only the parties thereto. Though the views expressed in
Kunhayammed were thought of to be in conflict with the views
expressed in certain other decisions
Prayas Buildcon Pvt.Ltd. vs State Of U.P.Thru.Prin.Secy.Housing & ... on
Sri D V Krishnappa vs Seetharam on 5 March, 2020
Bench: B.V.Nagarathna , Suraj
H K Munegowda vs M/O Finance on 4 March, 2020
-1- OA No.170
judgment
passed by apex Court in (2000) 6 SCC 359 titled Kunhayammed and others Vs.
State of Kerala and another , relied upon
