Search Results Page

Search Results

51 - 60 of 7890 (1.86 seconds)

Sharekhan Limited vs Darshini Shah on 9 December, 2025

segment (F&O). Petitioner permitted such transactions without securing any further KYC documents. On account of non-continuation of AMC scheme, Petitioner charged their ... Award dated 26 April 2022 holding the Petitioner responsible for not securing KYC documents from the Respondent at the time of reinitiation of trading activities
Bombay High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sharekhan Limited vs Darshini Shah on 9 December, 2025

segment (F&O). Petitioner permitted such transactions without securing any further KYC documents. On account of non-continuation of AMC scheme, Petitioner charged their ... Award dated 26 April 2022 holding the Petitioner responsible for not securing KYC documents from the Respondent at the time of reinitiation of trading activities
Bombay High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Gopal Singh Samund vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 6 May, 2026

thereafter fraudulently withdrawing money from those dormant/inoperative accounts by forging the KYC and Aadhaar documents of the account holders/depositors of the Bank ... months, and in order to revive such dormant/inoperative account, re-KYC through the branch of the Bank via biometric channel is mandatory. He further
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
Previous   2 3 4 5 6   7 8 9 10 11 Next