pertaining
to Corporation Bank and saving Account No. SB/01/1905 alongwith KYC
documents and he identified the photographs of Vinay Mittal ... documents vide Ex.PW31/B.PW31 also identified KYC documents of
Varam Kumar Gupta vide Ex.PW31/C. PW31 upon being shown
date
of the opening the account of the defendant no.2, KYC compliance of
the account of defendant no.2 and also for the CCTV ... further submitted that the account of the defendant no.2
was KYC compliant and had been opened much prior to the collection
of the cheques
proved its seizure memo Ex.Pw20/A.
10.20 Pw21 proved CAF, KYC and CDR of mobile no.
9911616420, issued in the name of Rahusu ... respectively. He also proved CAF, KYC and CDR
of mobile no. 9540962813, issued in the name of Asif
allotted to respondent no. 1 after his due
execution of the KYC, Member-Client Agreement, Risk Disclosure
Documents (RDD), which clearly stated the risk associated ... that investments in
stocks/capital market did not have guaranteed returns. The KYC
was executed between parties on 05/02/2016, which had arbitration
clause
amount was still not released. The Defendants subsequently demanded the KYC
documents of M/s KS Impex/Defendant No. 4 and threatened that non-completion ... would prevent the release of the funds. The Plaintiff allegedly managed the KYC
details of M/s KS Impex/Defendant No. 4 and sent them
allotted to respondent no.1 after his
duly execution of the KYC, Member -Client Agreement, Risk Disclosure
Documents (RDD) which clearly states the risk associated ... obligation of the member and the constituent inters
and the said KYC executed on 21.06.2016. It is averred that in terms of the said
KYC
that the defendant no. 2 utterly
failed to enforce KYC norms in letter and spirit and that the defendant
no. 1 also failed to observe ... collected the proceeds was opened after
compliance of Know Your Customer (KYC) norms and taking all care
required to be taken for opening
duly submitted
to the defendant no.1 bank on 04.04.2019 alongwith KYC
and vide letters dated 01.04.2019, the partners of plaintiff
no.1 firm also ... Deed dated 01.04.2019 i.e. Ex.PW1/7.
7. Photocopy of KYC form along with letter dated
01.04.2019 and partnership deed dated
duly submitted
to the defendant no.1 bank on 04.04.2019 alongwith KYC
and vide letters dated 01.04.2019, the partners of plaintiff
no.1 firm also ... does not bear signature of
Defendants? OPD2 and 3
2. Whether KYC form dated 04.04.2019 is a forged
and fabricated document were forged by Late
stating that the
concerned bank had fully adhered to the KYC Norms. On further
investigation from the Election Commission office, it was found that ... opened after due
verification of documents and in compliance of the KYC Norms
prescribed by the RBI. It is further stated that the banking
Life
