fact whether the land is a public land or not. The plaintiffs cannot be evicted from the suit land on the basis ... disputed land since 1936 and the disputed involved complicated questions of title. As regards the structures on the disputed land having been pulled down earlier
only. There shall be a decree for khas possession of the land described in schedule A appended to the plaint in favour of the plaintiff ... series and/or 2 are directed to pull down the buildings erected on the land described in the said schedule A, to remove the materials
party might exercise their right to the taking of water to their lands through the channel and a reasonable time should be given ... dispute between two parties over a piece of land, one of the parties has pulled down a costly building on it, claiming
mandatory injunction compelling defendant No. 3 to pull down the erections on 7 dhurs of land. In my judgment, it makes no difference that
regulate the incidents of the homestead land, I see no reason why such a homestead land cannot be transferred. There the raiyat is not transferring ... equal efficiency upon the homestead land as well.
In the present case, the finding being that both the raiyati lands and the homestead have been
evidence of DW 3 it appears that the main building over the land was of a bungalow type consisting of several rooms and verandahs ... admitted position that the main building over the land was never demolished or pulled down but was always used as a dwelling house although with
tenure-holders in land and of the mortgagees and
lessees of such interests, and to provide for the
constitution of a Land Commission ... which the Pull Bench held that the Bihar Land Reforms Act was covered by entry 36 of List II of the Constitution. In appeal
sold apart from the land on which it stood with a view to being pulled down, no right of pre-emption could be claimed with ... emptor without the land
on which it stands. After the passing of the house to the pre-emptor, the land will be left
came in possession of these lands as Malik. R.S. Plot No.
837 and 838 were Dih Basgit land of Chulahi Mian ... Department nor, did he pull the
chain and carry their papers. Chulahi did not got his name
entered in these lands in collusion with these
subject
of private ownership. If there be slow
accretion to the land on either side,
due, for instance, to` the gradual
accumulation of silt, this ... submit
that without appreciating the concept of topo land,
certain paragraphs of this judgment have been pulled
out and quoted out of context
