Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Government land for being used mostly to assign these lands to landless poor. Gomal land (grazing land) is specifically reserved from time immemorial in every

State; (v) the provision of land for residential purposes to the poor or landless or to persons residing in areas affected by natural calamities ... slum areas; or (c) for relieving congestion; or (d) for housing poor, landless, or displaced persons, or persons residing in areas affected by floods

residents in a neighbouring or nearby village; (iii) Educational Institutions; (iv) Poor and landless persons ordinarily resident in the village; (v) Ex-Servicemen; (vi) Insufficient ... holders ordinarily resident in the village; (vii) Poor and landless persons ordinarily residing in neighbouring or nearby villages; (viii) Insufficient holders ordinarily residing in neighbouring

initial stage the transaction could have been reversed and the poor landless people who have spent their hard earned money in buying these lands would

Sri. G.M.Venkatareddy vs The Deputy Commissioner on 23 May, 2012 Author: Vikramajit Sen

include acquisition of land for purposes of housing of poor, landless, or displaced persons etc. and where the land is needed by a building ... condition of the members thereof is making the rich richer and the poor poorer. This according to the petitioner offends Articles

initial stage the transaction could have been reversed and the poor landless people who have spent their hard earned money in buying these lands would

enacted with the purpose of granting land to the landless poor. The aim of the enactments or rules is that the 'have nots ... provisions for regularisation of unauthorised occupation is meant only to the landless poor persons but not to the persons who are already holding the land

another order dated 8.1.1977 distributing the said surplus land amongst the landless poor formers. 3. The said Parameswara (respondent No. 3(a)) who is another ... lands which were held surplus were already distributed among the poor landless agriculturists and therefore it would be proper on the part of the Tribunal

away by the State and distributed to other landless persons whereas the petitioners themselves are landless persons and the learned advocate contend that even assuming ... initial stage the transaction could have been reversed and the poor landless people who have spent their hard earned money in buying these lands would