ordinary course of nature to cause death.
11. The landmark judgment in Virsa Singh vs. State of Punjab [1] draws a
distinction between “Thirdly
Sudhir Goel vs M.C.D. [Along With W.P. (C) No. ... on 25 May
multiplicity of the precedents and suffice it would to quote a couple
judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court also in this regard, which ... Apex Court in this regard.
20. Firstly, the following from the landmark judgment of
Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Secretary, State
down by a Constitution Bench of the Apex
Court in the landmark judgment in Direct Recruit Class II Engineering
Officers' Association v. State
Supreme Court recognised the primary importance of education in its landmark judgment in Unnikrishnan v. State of Andhra Pradesh , . The Supreme Court held that education
Learned counsel for the appellant has
placed his reliance upon a landmark judgment of the Honble
Apex Court in the case of " Earabhadrappa
method has been explained by the
Supreme Court earlier in the landmark judgments in
Kerala State Road Transport Corporation v. Susamma
Thomas
amount of care which is obligatory.
6. What is stated in the judgment of the Calcutta High Court, in Jeet Kumari v. Chittagong ... principle of burden of proof. A landmark judgment of the Supreme Court in Shyam Sunder v. State of Rajasthan
Kirtilal Kalidas & Co. vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax on 17 October, 1997
Equivalent
scope of Section 154 . Learned counsel also placed reliance on the landmark judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case