agreed to purchase from 'R' a leasehold plot. 'R' was not having lease of the land in his favour from ... obtain permission and sanction from the Government before the transfer of leasehold plot. 'R' did not take any steps to apply
favour of the plaintiff only
after getting transfer of the leasehold plot in his favour
by the Housing Board. However, pending transfer of the
property
this notification imposed under covenants, terms and conditions on the leasehold plots whether by State Government or by Chennai Municipal Corporation or any other Government
evidence of P.W. 1 to the effect that in the leasehold plot his father Swami-natha Pillai and Velayutha Nadar constructed a brick-built
procedure for according approval for transfer of leasehold rights on the
allotted plot for balance lease period in favour of the transferee unit in Office ... through Offcial
Liquidator/Court/NCLT approval for transfer of leasehold rights
of the allotted plot shall be accorded in favour Auction
Purchaser (transferee unit
that case A agreed to purchase from R a leasehold plot. R was not having lease of the land in his favour from the Government ... obtain permission and sanction from the Government before the transfer of leasehold plot. R did not take any steps to apply for the sanction from
Katial , the agreement to sell the house property built on leasehold plot belonging to Government provided that the vendor should obtain the necessary permission
availing financial assistance by mortgaging the leasehold rights of the plots at S IPC OT Industrial Complex, Cuddalore. The Company committed default in repayment ... 2005 dated 05.01.2005 for transferring the leasehold rights of Plot No.C 14 to C 16 and C 16A with an extent of 64.49 acres
further submitted that they had mortgaged the leasehold rights of the property situated at Plot No.77, admeasuring 197.15 acres with various financial institutions ... second respondent issued No Objection for mortgaging the leasehold rights of Plot No.77 with an extent of 197.15 acres in Phase
substantial justice. The sixth respondent had mortgaged the leasehold rights of the property situated at Plot No.77, admeasuring 197.15 acres with various financial institutions ... second respondent issued No Objection for mortgaging the leasehold rights of Plot No.77 with an extent of 197.15 acres in Phase
