dismissal of the
application filed by the petitioners / tenants for leave to defend the petition
for eviction filed by the respondents / landlords under Section ... 2017 Page 3 of 14
7. The petitioners / tenants sought leave to defend pleading (i) that the
said V.K. Gupta had executed a registered
dismissal of the application filed by the petitioner / tenant for
leave to defend the petition for eviction under Section ... have any other reasonable / suitable
accommodation.
4. The petitioner / tenant sought leave to defend pleading (i) that the
"earlier landlord Girwar Singh" never
summons for judgment as
aforesaid were issued to the defendants.
7. The defendants seek leave to defend on the following grounds ... defendants for leave to defend fails
on this count. The plea of the defendants in the leave to defend of having
received
plaintiff is not entitled to leave to sign
judgment, and the defendant is entitled to unconditional
leave to defend the suit.
17.2 If the defendant ... reasonable defence, the defendant is entitled to
unconditional leave to defend. Leave is granted to defend
even in cases where the defendant upon disclosing
plaintiffs have challenged the
decision rendered in the impugned judgement granting leave to defend in favour
of appellant / defendant by filing a cross objection ... monthly
occupational charge of Rs.4,00,000/- to enjoy the leave to defend is proper or
not.
At the time of hearing of this
self contradictory.
5. The ARC by the impugned order has granted leave to defend to the
respondent on the following salient grounds:-
(i) first triable ... Based on the above two grounds the ARC has granted leave to defend
to the respondent.
7. I may first see the scope
Delhi) of dismissal of the application filed by the
petitioner for leave to defend the petition for eviction under Section ... shop in
his tenancy.
4. The petitioner/tenant applied for leave to defend pleading (i) that there
is no relationship of landlord and tenant between
owing to the petitioners having not filed the application for
leave to defend within 15 days from 23rd February, 2012 i.e. by 9th
March ... impugned order shows that the application of
the petitioners for leave to defend has not been considered on merits,
relying on Prithipal Singh Vs. Satpal
other alternate accommodation available to
him.
5. The respondent sought leave to defend pleading; a) that the
petitioner has been residing in the first ... fide.
6. Besides the aforesaid, the respondent in the application for leave to
defend denied the other contents of the petition for eviction and vaguely
being filed.
3. The petitioners filed a cryptic application for leave to defend. The only
argument raised was that there is no information given ... respondents. That in sum and
substance was the ground on which leave to defend was sought. The
respondent filed his reply to the said application
