Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is posted as Lekhpal. He submits that the irregularities committed in the revenue record ... basis of mutation done by the earlier Lekhpal and the petitioner has no role to play in the commission of the offence in question, hence
allegations made therein and the petitioner was never posted and worked as Lekhpal of the village in the year 2004 and has not prepared
further submits that the petitioner was appointed on the post of Lekhpal in the year 2016 but he did not join on the said post
counsel for the petitioner submits that the father of the petitioner was Lekhpal. He is said to have done some manipulation in the allotment proceedings
petitioner submits that the petitioner had acted upon the report of Lekhpal and in pursuance of that, allotment of land was given to concerned persons ... enquiry was conducted and he was reverted back to the post of Lekhpal from the post of Kanoongo. He submits that the petitioner has already
