Lekhpal vs State Of U.P. Thru.Its Prin. Secy. ... on 8 April, 2024
Author: Pankaj Bhatia
Bench: Pankaj Bhatia
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ... Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3871 of 2024
Applicant :- Lekhpal
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru.Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home
Counsel
Shyamu @ Lekhpal vs State Of U.P Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home ... on 9 May, 2024
Author: Pankaj Bhatia
Bench: Pankaj Bhatia
HIGH COURT ... Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4898 of 2024
Applicant :- Shyamu @ Lekhpal
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Civil Secrt
possession is not recorded in the said possession note. No signatures of Lekhpal or the Accountant are borne out from the perusal of the possession ... even the said possession memo does not bear the signatures of the Lekhpal who is said to have taken the possession. The possession memo further
dated 31(Sic) November, 1987. One Sarjeet Singh, Bhulekh Nirikshak, and the Lekhpal of the area have taken the possession. Petitioners or their father ... whether the possession can be taken by the Revenue Inspector and the Lekhpal as representative of the District Magistrate.
The Supreme Court in the case
abetment of three offences committed by three public servants namely the two Lekhpals who have caused the preparation of an incorrect Khasra knowing ... private complaint was therefore incompetent.
7. The alleged offence against the Lekhpals and their abettor Hari Nath Singh in the other two cases
Pankaj Bhatia,J.
The petitioner had retired from the post of Lekhpal on 31.1.2019. He is not being given the benefit of pension scheme ... initial appointment of the petitioner in 1978 was on substantive post of Lekhpal as per the provisions of Lekhpal Service Rules, 1958. However
Pankaj Bhatia,J.
The petitioner had retired from the post of Lekhpal on 31.3.2018. He is not being given the benefit of pension scheme ... initial appointment of the petitioner in 1978 was on substantive post of Lekhpal as per the provisions of Lekhpal Service Rules, 1958. However
Pankaj Bhatia,J.
The petitioner had retired from the post of Lekhpal on 31.5.2018. He is not being given the benefit of pension scheme ... initial appointment of the petitioner in 1978 was on substantive post of Lekhpal as per the provisions of Lekhpal Service Rules, 1958. However
Pankaj Bhatia,J.
The petitioner had retired from the post of Lekhpal on 31.1.2020. He is not being given the benefit of pension scheme ... initial appointment of the petitioner in 1978 was on substantive post of Lekhpal as per the provisions of Lekhpal Service Rules, 1958. However
Pankaj Bhatia,J.
The petitioner had retired from the post of Lekhpal on 30.6.2017. He is not being given the benefit of pension scheme ... initial appointment of the petitioner in 1978 was on substantive post of Lekhpal as per the provisions of Lekhpal Service Rules, 1958. However
