substantive post of Lekhpal as per the provisions of Lekhpal Service Rules, 1958. However, he was not having training from Lekhpal Training School ... satisfactory service, were entitled to undergo three months training at the Lekhpal Training School.
The case of the petitioner is that he had completed
substantive post of Lekhpal as per the provisions of Lekhpal Service Rules, 1958. However, he was not having training from Lekhpal Training School ... satisfactory service, were entitled to undergo three months training at the Lekhpal Training School.
The case of the petitioner is that he had completed
substantive post of Lekhpal as per the provisions of Lekhpal Service Rules, 1958. However, he was not having training from Lekhpal Training School ... satisfactory service, were entitled to undergo three months training at the Lekhpal Training School.
The case of the petitioner is that he had completed
substantive post of Lekhpal as per the provisions of Lekhpal Service Rules, 1958. However, he was not having training from Lekhpal Training School ... satisfactory service, were entitled to undergo three months training at the Lekhpal Training School.
The case of the petitioner is that he had completed
substantive post of Lekhpal as per the provisions of Lekhpal Service Rules, 1958. However, he was not having training from Lekhpal Training School ... satisfactory service, were entitled to undergo three months training at the Lekhpal Training School.
The case of the petitioner is that he had completed
substantive post of Lekhpal as per the provisions of Lekhpal Service Rules, 1958. However, he was not having training from Lekhpal Training School ... satisfactory service, were entitled to undergo three months training at the Lekhpal Training School.
The case of the petitioner is that he had completed
substantive post of Lekhpal as per the provisions of Lekhpal Service Rules, 1958. However, he was not having training from Lekhpal Training School ... satisfactory service, were entitled to undergo three months training at the Lekhpal Training School.
The case of the petitioner is that he had completed
substantive post of Lekhpal as per the provisions of Lekhpal Service Rules, 1958. However, he was not having training from Lekhpal Training School ... satisfactory service, were entitled to undergo three months training at the Lekhpal Training School.
The case of the petitioner is that he had completed
substantive post of Lekhpal as per the provisions of Lekhpal Service Rules, 1958. However, he was not having training from Lekhpal Training School ... satisfactory service, were entitled to undergo three months training at the Lekhpal Training School.
The case of the petitioner is that he had completed
substantive post of Lekhpal as per the provisions of Lekhpal Service Rules, 1958. However, he was not having training from Lekhpal Training School ... satisfactory service, were entitled to undergo three months training at the Lekhpal Training School.
The case of the petitioner is that he had completed
