Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 3542 (0.03 seconds)

State Of Haryana vs Yad Ram on 14 October, 1986

merits of the case and joined his client to urge only for leniency in the punishment. The learned Additional Sessions Judge, Narnaul, affirming the order ... thought adequate to achieve the purpose of the Act. The leniency in punishment provided in S. 16 was seen as one of the causes which
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

Bal Krishan vs State Of Punjab on 1 July, 2015

Kakkar submitted that the petitioner already having been treated with extreme leniency despite his absence for 15 long years, no further relief should be granted ... absence period of the petitioner as leave of the kind due, is leniency enough shown to the petitioner, either under the shelter of the order
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A R Singh - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next