Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 2879 (6.81 seconds)

Madan N Deshpande vs Department Of Posts on 30 January, 2026

applicant deposited the amount of misappropriation but that is not sufficient for leniency. Because the applicant dented the image of Post Office and the Government ... therefore, no leniency was required in the case. Appropriate punishment has been awarded. 5. Therefore, the only question remains before this Court is :- "Whether
Central Administrative Tribunal - Bangalore Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sunil R Lamani vs Deptt Of Posts on 23 October, 2024

submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that some leniency was required in the punishment but the punishment of removal has been awarded ... deposited the amount also. Therefore, he was entitled for some leniency. 5. On the other side, the respondents' counsel oppose the contention and submitted
Central Administrative Tribunal - Bangalore Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next