Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 429 (0.68 seconds)

Wildlife vs Abdul Sattar on 3 February, 2025

verified to be that of skins of leopard. That IO measured both the recovered leopard skins and verified to be that of skins of leopard ... containing two leopard skins and Wild Life Inspectors present with raiding party checked and verified the skins as leopard and said skins were seized
Delhi District Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Wildlife vs . Ashok Kumar & Ors. on 11 April, 2018

confirm the identity of the animal skin. He stated that skin which have typical characteristics like of tiger, leopard, jungle cat or any skin having ... fake skin to confirm the skin type. He further stated that he can distinguish between the skin of leopard cub and adult leopard. He further
Delhi District Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Wildlife vs . Balwant Rai Etc. on 30 May, 2017

animal skins from the accused vide seizure memo dated 13.04.97, 15.04.97 & 16.04.97: (i)  Lepard Skin uncured (adult) ­02 pcs. (ii) Baby Leopard Skin uncured ... statement and got recovered one tiger skin and one skin of kid/cub of tiger. Both the skins were taken into possession vide memo
Delhi District Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Wildlife vs Tausif Ahmad on 30 November, 2024

indentification memo and told us that skin is original. The skin was also measured. The skin was taken into police possession after sealing the same ... office. That skins were very well preserved. Witness stated that skins were very well preserved, however could not tell how old the skins were
Delhi District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Cbi (Wildlife) vs . Chand Ram Etc. on 19 April, 2017

found containing four skins while packet B was found containing three skins. Thereafter, analysis of the skins were conducted by him which is based ... skin   in   packet   A   marked   as 517/A­4 and one skin in packet B marked as 517/B­3 are of leopard while   other
Delhi District Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Cbi (Wildlife) vs . Menodeen & Ors. on 3 April, 2018

full   size  skin.  He   stated   that   all   these skins were identified by Sh. B.S. Gurm as to be of leopard. He stated ... skin.   In the absence of chemical analysis/forensic examination of the skins, it cannot be said with certainty that the recovered skins were of leopard
Delhi District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Wildlife vs Chirag Kotecha on 6 November, 2023

fake skins or skins of other wild animals and in one instance the skin recovered upon examination was found to be the skin ... sufficient to state with certitude that the recovered skins were indeed skins of leopards and not of other wild or domestic animal. 13.To conclude
Delhi District Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next