Faizabad Ayodhya Development ... vs Dr. Rajesh Kumar Pandey on 20 May, 2022
Faizabad Ayodhya Development ... vs Dr. Rajesh Kumar Pandey on 20 May, 2022
Author: M.R
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 988 (0.95 seconds)The Inter College, Through Its ... vs The State Of U.P. Through Secretary ... on 6 January, 2006
such manner nor the Regulations permit such interpretation. "Lex Non Cogit ad impossibilia." The law does not compel a man to do that ... impossible duty must be excused in accordance with the maxim, lex non cogit ad impossibilia (the law does not compel the doing of impossibilities
Nirmal Chandra Rout vs State Of Odisha on 4 February, 2026
Nirmal Chandra Rout vs State Of Odisha on 4 February, 2026
ORISSA HIGH COURT : CUTTACK
M.Sadasivan vs Kerala State Warehousing Corporation on 12 November, 2024
accordingly submitted that this is
a case where the principle, lex non cogit ad impossibilia is
applicable. In that regard, the learned Senior Counsel places ... Apex Court considered the principle underlying
the maxim lex non cogit ad impossibilia in Raj Kumar Dey
[(1987) 4 SCC 398] and held
Kerala State Warehousing Corporation vs Kerala State Warehousing Corporation ... on 12 November, 2024
accordingly submitted that this is
a case where the principle, lex non cogit ad impossibilia is
applicable. In that regard, the learned Senior Counsel places ... Apex Court considered the principle underlying
the maxim lex non cogit ad impossibilia in Raj Kumar Dey
[(1987) 4 SCC 398] and held
Subhash Pachori vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 30 July, 2024
doctrine of impossibility by taking note of latin maxim lex
non cogit ad impossibilia--reported in 2011 (7) SCC 639, it has been held ... understand the
scope of application of the doctrines of lex non cogit ad
impossibilia (the law does not compel a man to do what
M/S. Bain & Company India Pvt. Ltd., ... vs Ito (Tds) (International Taxation), ... on 10 November, 2021
This question is answered by two latin maxims, lex non cogit ad
impossibilia, i.e., the law does not demand the impossible and impotentia
excusat ... Latin maxims
become important at this stage. The first is lex non cogit ad
impossibilia i.e. the law does not demand the impossible
Sterling Abrasives Ltd,, Ahmedabad vs Assessee
administration of law. The other relevant maxim
is, lex non cogit ad impossibilia - the law does not compel a
man to do what he cannot ... contemplate
or require the performance of an impossible act - Lex non
cogit ad impossibilia. It is now to be seen whether the
expression "included
United Helicharters P.Ltd, Mumbai vs Assessee
counsel on the basis of a legal
Maxim lex non cogit ad impossibilia, meaning thereby that the
law cannot possibly compel a person ... administration of law. The other
relevant maxim is, lex non cogit ad impossibilia - the law
does not compel a man to do what he cannot
Sterling Abrasives Ltd,, Ahmedabad vs Assessee
administration of law. The other
relevant maxim is, lex non cogit ad impossibilia - the law does not compel a
man to do what he cannot ... contemplate or
require the performance of an impossible act - Lex non cogit ad impossibilia. It
is now to be seen whether the expression "included