natural guardian of a minor to deal with the minor's estate and bind the minor by his contracts, the following propositions are well ... guardian of the minors or to the minors themselves when they come of the age to discharge that liability raising the requisite funds in some
guardian of a minor acting on behalf of the minor enters into a transaction relating to the minor's property the transaction cannot ... behalf of a minor is not void ab initio; it can be avoided by the minor if he (minor) can establish that the guardian
covenant of a mere guardian cannot impose a personal liability on the minor ward. But the personal liability of a minor partner for a family ... question of the respondent's personal liability for debts incurred during his minority is a more difficult one. His share " is no doubt
important question argued in this appeal is as to the liability of the minor in respect of his share in the firm. It is conceded ... question as to the nature and extent of the liability of the minor, Keshavlal. We have been referred by Mr. Raikes to the decision
unconditional undertaking to pay a debt or loan for, the liability of the minor's estate is conditional upon the guardian's contract ... guardian of a Hindu minor could not make contracts on behalf of the minor so as to involve the minor and his estate in obligations
right to impose the risk and
liability upon the minor members. If the business which Beni
Ram, therefore, started were a new business and which ... liability due under
Exhibit 48, as we shall presently show if the liability
created or incurred under Exhibit 48 is not binding upon the
minor
Tota Sam and their minor sons. Anand Prakash is a minor son of Hazari Lal. Chaitan Sarup is a minor son of Tota ... Court made no pronouncement on the question as to the minors' liability to be declared insolvents and left the questions open as to whether
opinion that a. guardian can, on behalf of a minor, incur a liability which is under the Hindu Law binding upon him. This ... while recognising that the ruling does not affect the liability of a minor's estate under Section 68 of the Contract Act--which indeed
suit so far as it was founded on the personal liability of the minor failed. But there was no question of the validity ... Whenever a minor or a minor's estate is concerned, a distinction is well recognised in the Indian Law, between the liability
behalf of the minor so as to bind the minor; and, secondly, whether the contract is for the benefit of the minor. If either ... would follow. It may be that in the case of a minor that liability may have to be satisfied by the natural guardian or father