respondent that the petitioner had represented
himself as an agent of LIC and induced the defacto complainant to join ... categorically stated that the
petitioner has been appointed as an agent of LIC. Further he categorically
stated that though he was the Manager
receive any amount from the
complainant. The complainant is the LIC Agent. The accused for
purchasing the LIC bond ... lakh from the
complainant. The complainant was the LIC Agent, for the purpose
of purchasing the LIC Policy, she has given
Dharani. P Adv)
- Vs -
Accused: Mr. Sharanappa Arakere
47 Years, LIC Agent
1st Main, 9th Cross
Corner Building, Near Esawara
Temple, Defense Colony ... also
11 C.C. 27726/2014
working as LIC agent for the last 24 years. He deposed that,
his residential address situated
years. He deposed that, the
complainant was working as LIC agent and himself and
complainant are working in the Tata Institute. He deposed ... that, the complainant is being LIC agent and thereby, he was
obtained policy from the complainant for the last 10 year and
thereby
witness deposed that the deceased was working
as an LIC Agent. She was, however, unable to state as to
whom the mobile phone ... room and the
fact that the deceased was an LIC Agent.
32 Ashok Kumar (PW2) is brother of the deceased. He
has deposed
cross-examination, the complainant has stated that, he is
an LIC agent, he owns lands and gets rents from properties. He has further
point of
time. In fact the Complainant is an LIC Agent and he had taken
LIC Policy through Complainant. Same ... income of Rs.20,000/- per month as an
LIC Agent. Though he has stated that he is an Income Tax
Assessee
cross-examination categorically stated that he is
working as a LIC Agent and earning Rs.1,90,000/- per annum. He
further stated
deposed
that, she being a LIC agent and also doing network business
and apart from that, she was and is running a departmental
previous Director has introduced the complainant
who was working as LIC agent and also insisted to take Life Insurance
Policy from ... appellant is that the cheque in
question was issued to LIC premium does not constitute a probable
defense as the accused
