Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Sumit Pathak vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 1 July, 2024 Author: Anand Pathak

Major Amit Pathak vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 1 July, 2024 Author: Anand

Major Amit Pathak vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 1 July, 2024 Author: Anand

Sarvesh Chandra Pathak vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 1 July, 2024 Author: Anand

this case :- DATE EVENTS Appellant was appointed as an Agent of LIC bearing agency code No.355-356. 10/12/94 Appellant ... This is the case where appellant was appointed as an agent by LIC for district Morena having an agent code No.355356

LATE SHRI JAGANNATH PRASAD RATHIYA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, OCCUPATION: RETIRED FROM LIC INDIA FLAT NO 402, KABIR MANSION OPPOSITE SHRIRAM PALACE BADA ... MATHURA PRASAD GUPTA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCCUPATION: LIC AGENT FLAT NO 406 GOLDEN SIDE ALKAPURI GWALIOR (MADHYA PRADESH) .....RESPONDENT (BY SHRI HARISH

SRHI RAM MILAN PATEL, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCCUPATION: LIC AGENT R/O 133 TRIMURTI NAGAR DEENDAYAL UPADHYAY WARD DAMOHNAKA JABALPUR DISTRICT JABALPUR

that of buyer and seller and not of principal and the agent. This Court further went wrong in holding that URCs are parts of CSDs ... supra) reference was made to Parimal Chandra Raha and Ors. V. LIC The Bench hearing the matter unfortunately did not notice that there

that of buyer and seller and not of principal and the agent. This Court further went wrong in holding that URCs are parts of CSDs ... supra) reference was made to Parimal Chandra Raha and Ors. V. LIC The Bench hearing the matter unfortunately did not notice that there

that of buyer and seller and not of principal and the agent. This Court further went wrong in holding that URCs are parts of CSDs ... supra) reference was made to Parimal Chandra Raha and Ors. V. LIC The Bench hearing the matter unfortunately did not notice that there