therefore, the principle of delay and laches would not
frustrate the lis. Adverting to the merits, the High Court dealt with the
additional affidavit filed ... against the present respondents who were not impleaded as
parties to the lis before the tribunal. Once there is violation of
principles of natural justice
additional fine. He further
emphasized that the State Commission in deciding a lis, between
the respondent and the appellant, discharged judicial functions
and exercised judicial ... Learned senior counsel submitted that an adjudication of a lis
by a tribunal without a judicial member would be an anathema to
judicial process
that it would not
be appropriate for this Court to adjudicate the lis raised by the
petitioner in the present writ petition ... Supreme Court.
In this view of the matter, this lis raised by the petitioner, cannot
be gone into in the present writ petition. It would
been referred to
in the order did not pertain to the lis in question but was covered by the
binding precedent of this Court ... palpable error. A wrong
authority which had nothing to do with the lis was cited and that was
conceded to. An already existing binding precedent
almost nine years as that much time is consumed to decide
the lis and, in addition, to restrict the grant of maintenance to the date ... Judge should remember that the
procrastination is the greatest assassin of the lis before it. It not only
gives rise to more family problems
those facts are such which have a
nexus or relevance with the lis i.e. involved in the case. This Court
observed ... facts pleaded are such which have a nexus or relevance with the lis that is
involved in the case. Facts which have no [pic]bearing
these appeals, after hearing the
learned counsel for the parties to the lis, we dispose of all these
appeals by this common order ... filed cross objections therein. The Tribunal, after
hearing the parties to the lis, has rejected the appeal of the Revenue
and observed that recording
census in a particular manner by adding certain facets though the lis
was absolutely different. The appellant, the real aggrieved party,
was not arrayed ... appellant as he was not
a party to the said lis. This view of ours gets fructified by the
decision in H.C. Kulwant Singh
even the
necessity of conducting a trial in that lis in the wake of the Defendants’
averments in their Written Statement. Ergo, it seems ... conflict or the
distillation of the dispute between the parties to the lis, and are in the
nature of disputed questions of fact
case at hand, the Court had not decided the
lis in question as it had expressed an opinion that it had no jurisdiction
after having ... therein on the ground that the High Court had
already adjudicated the lis. Analysing the language employed in Rules
