therefore, the principle of delay and laches would not
frustrate the lis. Adverting to the merits, the High Court dealt with the
additional affidavit filed ... against the present respondents who were not impleaded as
parties to the lis before the tribunal. Once there is violation of
principles of natural justice
therefore, the principle of delay and laches would not
frustrate the lis. Adverting to the merits, the High Court
dealt with the additional affidavit filed ... against the present respondents who were not
impleaded as parties to the lis before the tribunal.
Once there is violation of principles of natural justice
been referred to
in the order did not pertain to the lis in question but was covered by the
binding precedent of this Court ... palpable error. A wrong
authority which had nothing to do with the lis was cited and that was
conceded to. An already existing binding precedent
almost nine years as that much time is consumed to decide
the lis and, in addition, to restrict the grant of maintenance to the date ... Judge should remember that the
procrastination is the greatest assassin of the lis before it. It not only
gives rise to more family problems
census in a particular manner by adding certain facets though the lis
was absolutely different. The appellant, the real aggrieved party,
was not arrayed ... appellant as he was not
a party to the said lis. This view of ours gets fructified by the
decision in H.C. Kulwant Singh
case at hand, the Court had not decided the
lis in question as it had expressed an opinion that it had no jurisdiction
after having ... therein on the ground that the High Court had
already adjudicated the lis. Analysing the language employed in Rules
census in a particular manner by
adding certain facets though the lis was absolutely
different. The appellant, the real aggrieved party, was not
arrayed ... appellant as he was not a party
to the said lis. This view of ours gets fructified by the
decision in H.C. Kulwant Singh
case at hand, the
Court had not decided the lis in question as it had expressed an
opinion that it had no jurisdiction after having ... therein on the
ground that the High Court had already adjudicated the lis.
Analysing the language employed in Rules
been referred to in the
order did not pertain to the lis in question but was covered
by the binding precedent of this Court ... palpable error. A wrong authority which had nothing to do
with the lis was cited and that was conceded to. An already
existing binding precedent
almost nine years as that much
time is consumed to decide the lis and, in addition, to
restrict the grant of maintenance to the date ... Judge should remember that the
procrastination is the greatest assassin of the lis before it.
It not only gives rise to more family problems
