suit schedule property which is
hit by the principles of lis pendency. The vendors of
this plaintiff were also aware that this defendant had
filed ... maintainable as it clearly hit by the principles of
lis pendency. The defendant from his birth is in
16 O.S.8044/2014
possession
that
Ex.P7 sale deed is hit by lis pendence. At the time of his
arguments, the learned counsel for the defendant ... another party under a decree in suit.
The principles of lis pendence prevents anything done by
the transferee from operating adversely to the interest
declared
Defendant in favour of Plaintiff No.6 is barred
bylaw of lis-pendency. The Plaintiff No.6 has no locus-standi to seek
partition ... lis pendens. But, in this case, the
purchaser made by the Plaintiff No.6 is not hit by lis pendency as
per the above said
plaintiff had sold the property to the plaintiff, which
amounted to lis-pendence and the purchaser of the
property i.e., the plaintiff had knowledge ... dispute that the plaintiff herein was a lis-
pendence/pendent-lite purchaser of the suit schedule
property'.
36. In the decision reported in Suraj
Sri. Riyaz vs Sri. Saidani Bi on 10 August, 2020
1 OS.No.16751/2002
suit schedule property purchased
from the parties which attracts the lis-
pendence or not?
5. Whether the defendants prove that the
amount stated
absolute
owners of schedule property and there is no lis-pendency
and claims of any nature. After the execution of said
agreement of sale ... defendants. But it is false to suggest
that there were no lis-pendency and claims of any nature as
the same was within the knowledge
counter-objections to the instant-appeal-memo.
17. During the lis pendence on the file of the instant-court, the
original-accused No.3/respondent ... case, it is
pertinent to make it clear that, during the lis pendence before the
trial court, the accused No.1 having been stated
alienated the suit property, in view of this rule of lis pendence
will applicable and no valid title is passed on to the defendants ... also contended that identity is not in dispute and rule of lis
pendence is aptly applicable to the facts on hand since the sale
deed
Therefore the said document is hit by
the principles of lis-pendence and not binding on the plaintiffs.
It is a sham and collusive document ... favour of 3 rd defendant on
14.8.2019. However the doctrine of lis-pendence is
applicable and thereby the alleged sale deed
