Dalpat Kumar And Anr. vs Prahlad Singh And Ors. on 16 December, 1991
alienation is made it would be subject to doctrine of lis pendence under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act. The High Court without
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 624 (1.32 seconds)Supreme General Films Exchange Ltd vs His Highness Maharaja Sir Brijnath ... on 4 August, 1975
Code, in fact, constitues
245
an application of the doctrine of lis pendence in the
circumstance specified there.
For the reasons given above, we dismiss
S. Sivaprakasam vs B.V. Muniraj & Ors on 3 April, 1997
subsequent purchaser under a simple money
decree. The doctrine of lis pendence applies. We find on
force in the contention. Section 52 of the Transfer
Devalsab (Dead) By Lrs vs Ibrahimsab F.Karajagi & Anr on 4 March, 2005
matter was pending before the trial court and it was lis
pendence. It was also held that the compromise decree obtained by
Defendant
Nadiminti Suryanarayan Murthy(Dead) vs Kothurthi Krishna Bhaskara Rao . on 9 October, 2017
decided amount.
33. It was brought to our notice that during the
pendency of this litigation, some more transactions
23
took place in relation ... such transactions are directly hit by the
principle of lis pendence, as contemplated under
Section 52 of the T.P. Act and, therefore
Somnath Chakraborty And Anr vs Appollo Gleneagles Hosp. Ltd & Ors on 23 July, 2014
under:
“12.2…….The title was in dispute. Hence the doctrine of lis pendence would
apply. During the pendency of the second appeal, the present respondents
Dalpat Kumar And Another vs Prahlad Singh And Others on 16 December, 1991
alienation is made it would be subject to doctrine of lis pendence under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act. The High Court without
Alka Shrirang Chavan vs Hemchandra Rajaram Bhonsale on 12 January, 2026
doctrine of lis
pendens.
41. In Celir LLP, this Court examined the expression
‘lis pendens’ in the following manner:
155. The term “lis pendens ... agreements in collusion with a party to a lis prior
to registration of such notice of pendency to circumvent the
due court process. This Court
Supreme General Films Exchange Ltd vs His Highness Maharaja Sir Brijnath ... on 4 August, 1975
Code, in fact, constitues
245
an application of the doctrine of lis pendence in the
circumstance specified there.
For the reasons given above, we dismiss
Rajender Singh & Ors vs Santa Singh & Ors on 16 August, 1973
doctrine of lis pendens simply because it was an extinction
during the pendency of a suit. If so wide was the sweep ... will not hit
by the doctrine of lis pendens simply. because it is an
extinction during the pendency of a suit. If so wide