tenth defendant would be hit by
the principle of lis pendence?; and
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
10
(vi) to what reliefs
members of the second respondent represented that there was no
encumbrance lis pendence or any charge whatsoever over the properties.
Believing their words, the petitioner
certificate and without pay is not sustainable since, the period of lis pendence
is not at the instance of the petitioner and the same cannot
certificate and without pay is not sustainable since, the period of lis pendence
is not at the instance of the petitioner and the same cannot
manifest error in applying the principle of lis pendens to
transactions that took place during the pendency ... rule of lis pendens. The
doctrine of lis pendens was explained in detail as follows:
''5........"Lis" means an action
hereunder:
Doctrine of lis pendens – Purchasers of property
pending partition suit sought to implead themselves –
their purchase hit by doctrine of lis pendens – cannot
claim ... suit
property and the property was purchased during the pendency of the suit
(Doctrine of lis pendens) and the trial Court has rightly dismissed
suit
only. Therefore, the transaction itself was in lis pendens, which was during the
pendency of the suit and all the transactions during the pendency
submits that during the pendency
of the partition suit, the plaintiff as well as his vendor purchased the
property is lis pendens and the said ... discussed above, during the pendency of the suit proceeding,
the plaintiff purchased the property and hit by doctrine of lis pendens.
However, the plaintiff
submits that during the pendency
of the partition suit, the plaintiff as well as his vendor purchased the
property is lis pendens and the said ... discussed above, during the pendency of the suit proceeding,
the plaintiff purchased the property and hit by doctrine of lis pendens.
However, the plaintiff
clear that all the sale deeds are affected by the principles of lis
pendens. Therefore, the Court ought not to have allowed the petition filed ... valid
under the principles of lis pendens proceedings. Further, the said Krishnan had
purchased the property during the pendency of the dispute before the Court