final decree proceedings, thereby, the alienations made
are hit by lis pendence. The lis pendence purchaser
purchasing a disputed property cannot improve upon his
rights ... lis pendence purchasers have no title
over the property, since all the transactions took place
during pendency of the litigation hit by lis pendence
defendant No.4 in favour of
the plaintiffs is hit by lis pendence having being executed during the
pendency of civil suit bearing ... plaintiffs by defendant No.4 is not hit by lis pendence. He submits that
the suit was instituted in 2004 by defendant
absolute
owners of schedule property and there is no lis-pendency
and claims of any nature. After the execution of said
agreement of sale ... defendants. But it is false to suggest
that there were no lis-pendency and claims of any nature as
the same was within the knowledge
Bangalore (CCH-8)
in respect of her property which tantamount to lis-pendency.
7
O.S.No.7336/2017
C/w. O.S.No.4955 ... 2010 filed by plaintiff against Judgment
Debtors/vendors. The law of lis-pendence will not arise and
this defendant was not the party
Bangalore (CCH-8)
in respect of her property which tantamount to lis-pendency.
Now defendant No.1 also illegally got building constructed ... 2010 filed by plaintiff against Judgment Debtors /
vendors. The law of lis-pendence will not arise and this
defendant was not the party
Bangalore (CCH-8)
in respect of her property which tantamount to lis-pendency.
7
O.S.No.7336/2017
C/w. O.S.No.4955 ... 2010 filed by plaintiff against Judgment
Debtors/vendors. The law of lis-pendence will not arise and
this defendant was not the party
Bangalore (CCH-8) in respect of her
property which tantamount to lis-pendency. Now defendant
No.1 also illegally got building constructed ... 2010 filed by plaintiff against Judgment Debtors /
vendors. The law of lis-pendence will not arise and this
defendant was not the party
Bangalore (CCH-8) in respect of her
property which tantamount to lis-pendency. Now defendant
No.1 also illegally got building constructed ... 2010 filed by plaintiff against Judgment Debtors /
vendors. The law of lis-pendence will not arise and this
defendant was not the party
Bangalore (CCH-8)
in respect of her property which tantamount to lis-pendency.
Now defendant No.1 also illegally got building constructed ... 2010 filed by plaintiff against Judgment Debtors /
vendors. The law of lis-pendence will not arise and this
defendant was not the party
doctrine of lis
pendens.
41. In Celir LLP, this Court examined the expression
‘lis pendens’ in the following manner:
155. The term “lis pendens ... agreements in collusion with a party to a lis prior
to registration of such notice of pendency to circumvent the
due court process. This Court
