Lloyd's Law Reports, 703
6 (2003) 2 LLR 364
7 (1912) Appeal cases page 1
8 AIR (2011) SC 442
::: Downloaded
Placing reliance on Sh. N.K. Sareen Vs.
Punjab National Bank (1994) LLR 676 laying down that an impartial enquiry is
an essential feature ... this Court in Indian Refrigeration
Industries Vs. Ram Rattan Sharma 2006 LLR 548 where though holding that
there is no absolute bar to an Advocate
Hindustan Associates Engineer Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Sh.
K.K. Aggarwal 2010 LLR 312 and in Shakuntala's Export House (P) Ltd.
Vs. Secretary (Labour ... petitioner has referred to Triloki Nath Vs. Sh.
Dharam Paul Arora 2006 LLR 1043 where a Division Bench of this Court
held that
Bihar Registration Rules, 2008
BIHAR
India
Bihar Registration Rules, 2008
Rule BIHAR-REGISTRATION-RULES-2008
added by Act, No. 14 of 2009 vide notification No. LLR-D (6)-20/2009-Leg. Dated 19.9.2009 published in R.H.P. (Extra-ordinary ... than fifteen percentum' by Act No.14 of 2009 vide notification No. . LLR-D (6)-20/2009-Leg. Dated 19.9.2009 published
The Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd. vs State Of Karnataka on 4 December, 2019
Equivalent
Motors Trading Co & Anr. , AIR 2004 Mad 127.
11 [1991] 2 LLR ... reproduced in pp. 128-129 of the report.
13 [1991] 2 LLR 127, at pp. 129-130.
14 Daval Aciers D'Usinor
this Court reported as Beer Singh v. Union of India, 1988 (2) LLR 413, on the one hand, and Murti Shree Ram Chander Ji Maharaj ... Singh v. The Special Land Acquisition Collector, District Courts, Jalandhar, 1984 (I) LLR 59 : (AIR 1984 P&H 177): 1984 PLR 568.
3. Section
sustained.
24. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on 2005 LLR 541 Sports Authority of India v. Sports Authority of India Kamgar Union ... Section 2(j) of the Act.
Similarly the pronouncements in 2005 LLR 796 Principal, Amar Shaheed Inter College v. Presiding Officer, Labour Court
Saini Vs. The Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Jaipur
and others 2001 LLR 747 the petitioner had not completed 240
days of work ... Silk Manufacturing Co, (P) Ltd. Vs. Garprasad
R. Jaiswal & Ors ; 1997 LLR 1126 it was held that workman
has to prove that
