decision Surendra Kumar V. Labour Court Uttarpradesh, Agra and another 2005 LLR 84 (All HC).
(k)If a workman has not rendered continuous service ... attracted as per decision State of Gujarat V. Ramesh Mopabhai Rathod 2004 LLR 255 (Guj HC).
(l)If an employee has not worked
Government in the decision of MUDRA COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED V. GANESHKUMAR {2010 LLR - 763 (Delhi High Court)}, it is held that the Personal Driver of General ... decision MANAGEMENT OF DIVISIONAL ENGINEER, TELECOMMUNICATIONS, MEHABOOB NAGAR DISTRICT V. VENKATAIAH {2007 LLR (SN)}.
63. Continuing further, raising of dispute by a workman upon
decision Surendra Kumar V. Labour Court Uttarpradesh, Agra and another 2005 LLR 84 (All HC).
(k)If a workman has not rendered continuous service ... attracted as per decision State of Gujarat V. Ramesh Mopabhai Rathod 2004 LLR 255 (Guj HC).
(l)If an employee has not worked
decision Surendra Kumar V. Labour Court Uttarpradesh, Agra and another 2005 LLR 84 (All HC).
(k)If a workman has not rendered continuous service ... attracted as per decision State of Gujarat V. Ramesh Mopabhai Rathod 2004 LLR 255 (Guj HC).
(l)If an employee has not worked
decision ARJUN HAZRA V. COAL INDIA LIMITED AND OTHERS , 2002 LLR 35 CAL.
17. We pertinently worth recalls the decision RAJENDRA MOHAN TRIVEDI V. INDUSTRIAL ... COURT, MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE AND OTHERS, 2000 LLR 243 (ALL), wherein it is held that 'holding of an enquiry will be imperative
decision Premchand v. Workmen Compensation Commissioner and others (2001) LLR SUM 955 (ALLHC).
24.Though as per the Workmen's Compensation Act , the Commissioner ... Management of Venkateswara Industries Chennai v. Deputy Commissioner Labour II, Chennai (2002) LLR 67 (MAD), it is held that 'interference by a High Court
R.Manimaran vs Managing Director on 20 August, 2013
Author: M.Venugopal
Bench: M.Venugopal
Further, in the decision Cominco Benani Zinc. Ltd., V. Papachan (1989 LLR page 123 (ker.), it is held that if the contractor fails ... decision T.Chandra Mohan Nair V. Fertilizers and Chemicals Travancore Ltd., (1994 LLR at page 626 (Ker.), it is held that ' there
Jesuraj and S.Rajamanickam v. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Pondicherry (2002 LLR 1013). Though on the side of the respondent, a plea was taken that ... represented by Wings Wear Worker's Lal Jhanda Union (1996 LLR 802). In the decision S.Jina Chandran v. Registrar of Co-operative Societies
COKING COAL LTD., Vs. SHIB KUMAR DUSHAD & OTHERS
reported in 2001 LLR - 74, wherein it has held that
"Employee filing a writ petition ... Jesus
and Mary v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Dehradun reported in 2005
LLR 517, it is held that 'for redressal of a grievance
