sanction of the applied leave which directly contravene the
provision of LLR where the employee should proceed on recorded leave with prior
intimation and sanction
following the ratio in Suman Tuteja v. Hindalco
", ■
Industries Ltd. 2012 LLR 902, as the applicant's leave was
never refused or rejected
From the above, it"llr-apspiresJbaW-h^apprtTcaht has clearly admitted
'"-u.
:
that he was not able to correctly reproduce the paragraph
arbitrariness - HelcUthougb a candidate who has passed an
whose/-har^eO^\llr¥ ft? list does not have an
examination or t
indefeasible right
Inspector of CGST
& CX, Range - V, Bidhannagar
m
J- \m
'llr ■-
r
: ** ■
y
l~s I
r
Commissionerate and residing
Slheisa^lk,
8.
/
J^ccoi^gly,
jpcW 11 /'ik. wr
to^llr %show-
%
^^pffieipt of ^J'py If this
J noigg
iJAe^sion arrived at
from the date ..of recei'
r A * llr*
should be^bi^jifhted
|iil luch time th^^e^isin
