mandatory for
filing of appeal against order of Controlling Authority. [See
: 1990 LLR 28 (Madras High Court) Onward Trading Co., Madras v.
Dy. Commissioner ... after the prescribed
period of limitation will not be maintainable. [See
: 1994 LLR 894 (Bombay High Court) Gurudeo Ayurved Mahavidyalaya
Gurukul Ashram v. Madhav
Patel submitted that according to decision of Apex Court
reported in 2005 LLR 417 in case of K.C. Sharma v. Delhi Stock
Exchange , wherein ... Seeds Growers Union
Limited v. Shaileshkumar Harshadbhai Shah reported
in 2006 LLR 1052,
wherein, Apex Court has held in para 15 that "Supervision
contemplates
case of Punjab State Electricity
Board VS. Darbara Singh reported in 2006 LLR 68 (SC),
in case of Punjab State Electricity Board and Anr reported ... LLR 414 (SC), in case of Kishore Chandra Samal Vs. Divisional
Manager, Orissa State Cashew Development Corporation Ltd, Dhenkanal
reported
labour court considering decisions relied upon by respondent
workman, reported in 1999 LLR page 8; 1999 LLR 319; 2000 LLR 1199;
2000 (1) LLR
submissions; (i) 2005 (8) Scale 627 and 631 (ii) 2005 LLR 1211 SC, (iii) 2006 LLR 65 SC and (iv) 2004 LLR 255 (Gujarat High
Swami reported in 2007 LLR 752.
The relevant observation is as under:
"....The
conductor performs only the duty of issuing tickets to the
passengers ... Vinodkumar reported in 2008 LLR 121
and in case of Uttranchal Transport Corporation Vs.
Sanjaykumar Navtiyal reported in 2008 LLR 673 as well as
considered
Court (2) LML Limited v. E.S.I. Corporation reported in 2000 LLR 289 (All)). Similarly Bombay, Allahabad, Madras and Andra Pradesh High Courts ... Esvees v. Regional Director, Employees' State Insurance Corporation reported in 2000 LLR 285, in Paras 5 and 6, has observed as under:
5. Even
Shanti
Garments Pvt. Ltd. v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner ,
reported in 2003 LLR 256 (Madras). Relevant
paragraph 4, 7 and 8 of said judgment ... Union Territory, Chandigarh v.Toylor Instrument
Company (India) Ltd., reported in 1993 LLR 334. Therefore,
in this case, instead of deciding controversy between parties
labour court
considering decisions relied upon by respondent workman, reported in
1999 LLR page 8; 1999 LLR 319; 2000 LLR 1199; 2000 (1) LLR
UPSRTC v. Mohanlal Gupta and Others, reported in
2001 LLR 1154; a decision reported in AIR 2003 SC 1462; UPSRTC, Itawa
v. Hotilal and Others ... Apex Court in case of UPSRTC v.
Nanhelal Kushawa, reported in 2009 LLR 1149 and thereafter, recent
decision of Apex Court in case of UPSRTC
