issued by
the District Transport Officer, Nagaland, for driving motor cycle and LMV
(Light Motor Vehicles) only; it was issued on 24.5.2010 and was valid ... been issued to respondent No.1 to
drive light motor vehicles (LMV) and motor cycle/scooter on 24.5.2010, with
validity upto 23.5.2017. The earlier licence
licence, where the category of vehicles are mentioned,
clearly shows that for LMV (Light Motor Vehicle) and MCWG
(Motor Cycle With Gear), the licence ... same date
i.e. 19.04.2007, as was the case with regard to LMV/MCWG. It is
incomprehensible and in any case beyond common sense
Hazara Singh, resident of Mazara Jattan, District SBS Nagar for
scooter LMV valid upto 12.12.2007 and that on 16.04.2010, the police
had submitted an application ... driving license issued to Kuldip Singh
authorizes him to drive scooter and LMV only. It being so, there is no
question of the owner
Nishan Singh) was holding a valid licence to drive Light
Motor Vehicle (LMV). The said licence (Ex.R-3) was issued on
11.03.2002 and valid ... person holding a valid licence to
drive a Light Motor Vehicle (LMV) would include authorization to drive
7 of 8
::: Downloaded
tractor trolley, as he was holding a driving licence for 'LMV,
MT and Motorcycle' only and there was no endorsement, authorising ... Dilip Ram (who was driver of the offending
vehicle) is for 'LMV and MT' and is covered within the same category. So,
there
60842 dated 11.6.2004 issued in the name of Simarnjit Singh for
scooter LMV and endorsement for HMV (Commercial) up to 10.3.2006.
He proved the licence
issue is depicted as 15.08.2014 while that of Light
Motor Vehicle (LMV) is depicted as 12.08.2002. The validity of the said
licence for non-transport
motor cycle with and without gear and
private light motor vehicle (LMV); there was no endorsement of transport
vehicle on the same. Therefore ... driver
holding a licence to drive light motor vehicle (LMV) is competent to drive a
transport vehicle of that category without specific endorsement to drive
whereas the license
held by respondent No.3- driver only pertained to LMV without there
being any such endorsement. Therefore, the license was notin
consonance
endorsement of the driving licence of
respondent no.1-driver is for LMV (non-Transport) whereas his permit should
RAJINDER PARSHAD JOSHI
