reference was on the question as to whether a lockout declared by the management of the First Respondent with effect from 26th ... 12th August 1994 that the question as to the legality of the lockout had already been decided on 5th May 1983 in a judgment
operations are still continuing, then, this amounts to nothing but an illegal lockout. Such a lockout could not have been effected without compliance with ... said Union, Maharashtra Association of General Workers challenged the illegal and malafide lockout by filing complaint before the Industrial Court and during the pendency
power supply to the factory as same was disconnected after the lockout was effected. The court had granted time. But again when the application ... passing the following operative order:
It is hereby declared that the lockout effected on 28/12/1980 by the Respondents till today vide notice
spread occasioning wide spread damage. The management of the Plaintiff declared a lockout at the end of the second shift, from ... April 1977 in all the three Divisions. A notice of lockout was published. The notice stipulated that Departments concerned with essential services such
down of the business itself and not the place of business. While lockout meant the closure of place of business and not closure of business ... business but he closes the business itself finally and irrevocably. A lockout on the other hand indicates the closure of the place of business
other things, claimed wages for the period the erstwhile management had declared lockout. That, under Section 25 of the Act, the liability of the erstwhile ... held that the employees are entitled to claim wages for the lockout period, such liability may remain undischarged out of the payments made
sickness, authorised leave, accident, strike, a strike which is not illegal, a lockout, cessation of work which is not due to the fault
