Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

having experience in grocery business. It further held that the lockout did not put the appellant out of his job permanently; the appellant

having experience in grocery business. It further held that the lockout did not put the appellant out of his job permanently; the appellant

proper appreciation of the matter. 3. Respondent No. 3 company had declared lockout around October, 1996 while strength of workmen in employment had been about ... lockout continued over a long period of time constraining majority of workmen to resign to the circumstances ending up in collection by them of their

payment to an employee in respect of any period of authorized leave, lockout, strike which is not illegal or layoff and] other additional remuneration

clause (a), the decision of the Labour Court in respect of strike, lockout, closure, stoppage etc. are made appealable. 10. Sub-section

reason of civil commotion, local combination of workmen, strike or lockout, affecting any of the trades employed on the work, or (v) by reason

reason of civil commotion, local combination of workmen, strike or lockout, affecting any of the trades employed on the work, or (v) by reason