whether
the strike at the Delhi Cloth Mills and the lockout declared
by the management on 24-2-1966 are justified and legal
and whether ... workmen are entitled to wages for the
period of lockout?". The Supreme Court has, in
paragraphs No.8, 9, 18 and 25, on which
safeguard the plant and machineries of the Factory, the Management
declared lockout in the Factory.
28. It further appears that on 24.07.2008, the lockout ... Management.
29. Pertinent that for the period of strike and lockout, the Union demanded wages
for workmen which gave rise to Reference Case
Writ Petition that the Second Party -
Management, illegally issued the order of lockout from
28.09.2015 and the Second Party - Management has linked the
issue ... Charter of Demands for declaring lockout without issuing
prior notice to the First Party - Union. It is further stated in the
claim petition that
ORDER DATED 10.04.2012 VIDE
ANNEXURE-A AND REPLACE IT BY THE WORDS LOCKOUT OF THE
FACTORY BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT MANAGEMENT.
-3-
THESE WRIT PETITIONS ... dated 10.04.2012 at
Annexure-P passed by respondent No.1 prohibiting the
lockout.
2. W.P. No.28183/2013 is preferred by the Parle
Workers
ORDER DATED 10.04.2012 VIDE
ANNEXURE-A AND REPLACE IT BY THE WORDS LOCKOUT OF THE
FACTORY BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT MANAGEMENT.
-3-
THESE WRIT PETITIONS ... dated 10.04.2012 at
Annexure-P passed by respondent No.1 prohibiting the
lockout.
2. W.P. No.28183/2013 is preferred by the Parle
Workers
4718/2024 ORDER DATED: 02/05/2024
undefined
08.06.2003 there was lockout. Taking note of the fact that for
the period of lockout ... case of all workmen
working with petitioner No.-1 company. During lockout period,
6 workmen were terminated which was also a subject matter
of Reference
4590/2024 ORDER DATED: 02/05/2024
undefined
08.06.2003 there was lockout. Taking note of the fact that for
the period of lockout ... case of all workmen
working with petitioner No.-1 company. During lockout period,
6 workmen were terminated which was also a subject matter
of Reference
ground that for the period 20.04.2003 to
08.06.2003 there was lockout. Taking note of the fact that for
Page 2 of 6
Downloaded ... 4866/2024 ORDER DATED: 02/05/2024
undefined
the period of lockout i.e. 20.04.2003 to 08.06.2003, whether
workman would be entitled for payment
4740/2024 ORDER DATED: 02/05/2024
undefined
08.06.2003 there was lockout. Taking note of the fact that for
the period of lockout ... case of all workmen
working with petitioner No.-1 company. During lockout period,
6 workmen were terminated which was also a subject matter
of Reference
ground that for the period 20.04.2003 to
08.06.2003 there was lockout. Taking note of the fact that for
Page 2 of 6
Downloaded ... 4721/2024 ORDER DATED: 02/05/2024
undefined
the period of lockout i.e. 20.04.2003 to 08.06.2003, whether
workman would be entitled for payment
