whereby the
Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (for short 'LTTE') has been declared as an
unlawful association ... that the Liberation Tigers of
Tamil Eelam (hereinafter referred to as the LTTE), is an association actually
based in Srilanka but having sympathizers, supporters
petitioner Vijayaratnam Sivanesan joined the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (in short LTTE) in November 1983 and worked as Video Cameraman. He was arrested ... March, 1990, and since, he was released he left the LTTE in 9th March, 1990. In the year 2010, the first respondent Union of India
declaring the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (in short LTTE) as an unlawful association. The petitioner-Forum said to have filed a petition claiming itself ... sympathizer of LTTE and have a right to appear before the Tribunal. It was contended that the Tribunal is required to adjudicate whether
Lanka. The security forces of Sri Lanka say that the threat of LTTE still exists. They are saying this to keep surveillanceblanket on Sri Lankan ... areas. They say that these young children have been trained by the LTTE. Even if they were trained by LTTE, they should be treated humanly
Zameer Ahmed Latifur Rehman Sheikh vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors on 23 April, 2010
that the petitioner was persistently extending support for an unlawful association viz., LTTE, which had been declared to be an unlawful association under the Unlawful
that he has not at all involved in any of the LTTE operations, rather he is one of the victims thereof, and that there
from the Central Prison, Palayamkottai,
was remanded for having contact with banned LTTE and without any identification,
he was made involved in the present case
Tamil Nadu police alleging that he had
sold explosive substances to LTTE. Petitioner is required for
interrogation and this is not a fit case
Whether the__ "lo'1)ver Appellate Court has
W.._Comm.ltte_d error in allowing the
; -V _ 'ap_pllt:ation for additional
