Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 19 (0.44 seconds)

Sri vs State Rep. By on 3 April, 2025

above crime No.1 of 2015 to Rejuvenate the banned LTTE organization and in pursuance of the conspiracy, appellant's said to have handed ... over the same to one “Kavi” of Srilankan Tamilan to reorganize the LTTE cadres and to eliminate rival Tamil leaders. Therefore they made the vehicle
Madras High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sri vs State Rep. By on 3 April, 2025

above crime No.1 of 2015 to Rejuvenate the banned LTTE organization and in pursuance of the conspiracy, appellant's said to have handed ... over the same to one “Kavi” of Srilankan Tamilan to reorganize the LTTE cadres and to eliminate rival Tamil leaders. Therefore they made the vehicle
Madras High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sri vs State Rep. By on 3 April, 2025

above crime No.1 of 2015 to Rejuvenate the banned LTTE organization and in pursuance of the conspiracy, appellant's said to have handed ... over the same to one “Kavi” of Srilankan Tamilan to reorganize the LTTE cadres and to eliminate rival Tamil leaders. Therefore they made the vehicle
Madras High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ramesh.A vs Union Of India on 16 December, 2025

transfers from Sri Lanka to India, through hawala channels for revival of LTTE activities. Accordingly, the appellant was arrested by the investigating agency ... show that the appellant and the other accused are cadres of the LTTE and they have conducted secret meetings and conspired to carry out illegal
Kerala High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next