MACPS, two financial upgradations will be granted both in
Page 5 of 11
Sub : MACP 6 OA 203/00428/2015
the case ... shall be counted for the purpose
of MACPs. Northern Railway's decision to decide MACP
cases contrary to these instructions is a clear violation
MACP No. 1128/16 and MACP No.1134/16 pertaining to the same road traffic
accident, which took place on 03.04.2013.
The first case ... bearing MACP No. 1128/16.
24. FORMIVB (MACP No. 1128/16)
SUMMARY OF THE COMPUTATION OF AWARD AMOUNT IN INJURY CASES
TO BE INCORPORATED
both these
cases on behalf of R1Ram Ashre (driver cum owner of the offending vehicle)
5. In the case bearing MACP ... this case.
In the instant case, the perusal of the record reveals that petitioner /
injured Ms. Indu Singh is a case of fracture of shaft
present case, since, common question of law and facts were
involved in both these cases/petitions bearing MACP No.1355/16 & MACP No.
1356 ... both these
cases bearing MACP No. 1355/16 & MACP No. 1356/16).
Further in the present case, it is being submitted on behalf
present cases, since, common question of law and facts were
involved in both these cases/DARs bearing MACP No.2315/16 & MACP No.
2305 ... bearing MACP
No. 2315/16 & MACP No. 2305/16).
Hence, in view of the above, Issue No. 2 is decided accordingly.
(MACP Nos. 2315
case/DAR bearing MACP No. 897/16 as "Leading Case"
(MACP Nos.897/16 & 898/16) Rajbir & Suraj .@ Anuj Vs. Harender ... case.
27. MEDICINES & TREATMENT
In the present case, as per record, the petitioner/injured has undergone
treatment at RTRM hospital, Jafarpur, New Delhi.
(MACP
case discussed in para
16.3 above was extended. For reasons already brought out,
the same becomes applicable in the instant case.
16.5 In the case ... this case.
23
In this case the applicant got 2nd ACP on 01.07.2004. It
was only thereafter that the new MACP Scheme had come
into
case where the applicant was not allowed
to represent. The APAR recorded has attained finality.
9. The applicant‟s case for grant of MACP ... launch of MACP
Scheme upto 2014, the year of retirement, and applicant has been
declared unfit for MACP. Hence, the applicant‟s case having considered
Kamal Malik ( owner of offending vehicle) in this
case.
MACP No. : 1252/16 Surgyan Singh Vs. Mam Chand ... disability due to
the injuries sustained in the accident in this case.
MACP No. : 1252/16 Surgyan Singh Vs. Mam Chand
produce any documentary evidence that the
applicant earns huge amounts in MACP cases. The
opponent denies that he was careless to the
applicant and their
