term 'past cases' inasmuch as those cases are not at all
governed by the MACP Scheme. In the face of such a finding ... case as the old scheme ceased to be operative from
1.9.2008, the expression 'past cases' cannot mean the cases in which the
benefit
that certain numbers of the cases
remained to be mentioned, especially four cases,
out of 18 cases, viz. 1) MACP No.369/29002 ... applicant that, out of these four
cases, now mentioned, one case, i.e. MACP No.
385/2002, was in fact, bearing old case
term 'past cases' inasmuch as those cases are not at all
governed by the MACP Scheme. In the face of such a finding ... case as the old scheme ceased to be operative from
1.9.2008, the expression 'past cases' cannot mean the cases in which the
benefit
1202.16
Accident Claims Tribunal-3, Nagpur in MACP Case Nos.1149 of 2005;
1150 of 2005; and 1156 of 2005 respectively filed ... partly allowed. The judgments,
dated 05.05.2012 passed in MACP Case Nos.1249 of 2005; 1250 of
2005; and 1256 of 2005 respectively by the learned
1202.16
Accident Claims Tribunal-3, Nagpur in MACP Case Nos.1149 of 2005;
1150 of 2005; and 1156 of 2005 respectively filed ... partly allowed. The judgments,
dated 05.05.2012 passed in MACP Case Nos.1249 of 2005; 1250 of
2005; and 1256 of 2005 respectively by the learned
1202.16
Accident Claims Tribunal-3, Nagpur in MACP Case Nos.1149 of 2005;
1150 of 2005; and 1156 of 2005 respectively filed ... partly allowed. The judgments,
dated 05.05.2012 passed in MACP Case Nos.1249 of 2005; 1250 of
2005; and 1256 of 2005 respectively by the learned
COURT :-
1. The petitioner / sole respondent in an accident claims case -
MACP No.37 of 2013, is aggrieved by multiple orders, which are as
under
3172.18.odt
passed by the Member, MACT, Akola in MACP Case No.63/2015,
during the pendency of the appeal.
With this order, civil
counsel for the applicants.
2. They were the claimants in the MACP case. The insurer
has deposited Rs.75,38,337/-. There are five claimants
seeking stay to the
execution of impugned judgment and award in MACP
Case No. 99/2016. The appellant has deposited the
entire decretal amount along
