SANGWAN, J. (Oral)
Prayer in this petition is for transfer of MACP case No.478 of
2020 filed by respondent No.4 under Sections ... before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal,
Kurukshetra to MACT, Kaithal, where MACP case No.8 of 2021 filed by
the petitioners is already pending.
Learned
[email protected]
... Respondents
Date of institution of the
case MACP no. (915/15) - 08.09.2015
Date of institution of the
case MACP ...
MACP No. 915/16 &
MACP No. 916/16 pertaining to the same road traffic
accident which took place on 29.06.2015.
b. The first
case
framed and both these cases were consolidated for the purpose of recording
the evidence by treating the case/DAR bearing MACP ... said case of R. K. Malik vs Kiran Pal13 ) in the case
titled as Chetan Malhotra vs Lala Ram14 . In the aforesaid case
MACP No. 1809/16 & MACP No. 1810/16 pertaining to the same road
traffic accident which took place on 23.04.2016.
b. The first case ... this case.
b. In the instant case, the perusal of the record reveals that petitioner /
injured - Kuldeep Anand is a case of Galeazzi fracture dislocation
present cases, since common question of law and facts were
involved in both these cases bearing MACP No.415/16 & MACP ... injured in this case.
b) In the instant case, the perusal of the record reveals that petitioner /
injured - Neeraj is a case of Traumatic Arthritis
MACP No. 743/17 & MACP No. 744/17,
the same were consolidated for the purpose of recording the evidence by
treating the case bearing ... petitioner, appears to apply to the facts of the present case.
MACP No. 743/17 & 744/17 Akash Bhardwaj & Ors. vs UPSRT
decided.
2. Important facts of the case are that Vishal (son of
petitioners in case MACP No. 102/17) died and Arjun Kashyap
(petitioner ... inquiry,
both these claim cases arising out of the same accident were
consolidated and it was ordered that the case MACP No.102/17
would
compensation as under :
1. Rs.34,99,300/- in CIS (MACP) Case No. 156 of 2014,
2. Rs.64,82,552/- in CIS (MAC) Case ... MACP) Case No. 176 of 2014,
4. Rs. 5,91,120/- in CIS (MACP) Case
amount, as determined by the learned
Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, in MACP
Case No. 51 of 2016. The Appeal from Order is
accompanied with ... Admit the AO No. 311 of 2018.
Summon the LCR of MACP Case No.
51 of 2016.
No LCRs are required to be summoned
MACP benefits. However, his position is that these letters do not
actually deny the benefits of MACP even in the case of unilateral transfer ... MACP and 2nd MACP. According to the
respondents this was the first mistake and an error committed in case of the
applicant. In Paragraph
