maintenance is also not disputed. There was a claim for deferred mahar payable at the time of divorce. There is dispute regarding the quantum ... deferred mahar and also as to whether there is any deferred mahar. Amounts were claimed under Section 3(1)(b) of the Act. The children
maintenance is also not disputed. There was a claim for deferred mahar payable at the time of divorce. There is dispute regarding the quantum ... deferred mahar and also as to whether there is any deferred mahar. Amounts were claimed under Section 3(1)(b) of the Act. The children
paltry amount of less than Rs. 2,000/- by way of mahar and past maintenance, spanned a period of nearly a decade and spread over ... period prior to 25-5-1973 and return of the mahar. There was exchange of correspondence between the lawyers of the parties. The suit
Muneer.V.P vs Fahida Mahar on 16 July, 2025
Author: P.V. Kunhikrishnan
Bench: P.V.Kunhikrishnan
2025:KER:52865
RPFC ... SIJU
SMT.RENY ANTO
SMT.S.SEETHA
RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS:
1 FAHIDA MAHAR
D/O. MUHAMMED, AGED 23 YEARS, RESIDING AT
KOTTARATH HOUSE,P.O KALLIKKANDY
iddath maintenance. Further that, the
respondent herein has not given her the Mahar of 5 sovereigns of gold,
as agreed at the time ... that the case of the petitioner is
that the value of the Mahar was 5 sovereigns of gold ornaments and the
same has not been
Mahar Bashir K.P vs The State Of Kerala on 2 March, 2018
Author: B.Kemal Pasha
Bench: B.Kemal Pasha
IN THE HIGH COURT ... CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-III,KOZHIKODE
---------------
PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED 1 TO 3:
1 MAHAR BASHIR K.P.,
S/O.ABDUL AZIZ, AGED 19 YEARS,
MOHASEENA MANZIL
claimed that at the time of marriage, when
the husband gave a mahar chain weighing six sovereigns, her
parents gave 70 sovereigns of gold ornaments ... also
utilized six sovereigns of gold chain which was given as
mahar, and three sovereigns of gold ornaments of the child.
She also claimed maintenance
claim, the counter petitioner in the M.C. has promised a mahar of 28 grams of gold ornaments and it was given. At the time ... evidence, the counter petitioner (husband) deposed that out of the mahar promised, only 14 grams of gold was given. Contention of the husband was that
ground that he did not belong to the scheduled
caste namely Mahars. The dispute was whether he
ceased to be a mahars when he joined ... that members of the
sect often act priests or gurus to the Mahars. The
Election Tribunal held that there are two divisions
among Mahanubhavas
sovereign)
2. to return 5.5 sovereigns of gold ornaments towards
Mahar or pay Rs.1,15,500/-.
3. to return fridge and mixer or otherwise ... petitioner is liable to return 5.5 sovereigns of
gold ornaments towards Mahar or an amount of `1,15,500/- and
also a fridge and mixi
