parties, the learned JMFC Parasia District Chhindwara
dismissed the maintenance application of the applicant
No.2, whereas the maintenance of Rs.2,000/- per month ... application dated
1.7.1994, she told that she had a child of nine months but
she neither amended her application for maintenance of her
child
award the maintenance from the date of order and if the maintenance is to be awarded from the date of application, the Court must record ... order, or, if so ordered from the date of the application for maintenance.
Even in the Criminal
held that the application on the ground of long delay in filing the application for maintenance is liable to be rejected. However, in this case ... filing of the application. It gives circumstances when application will not be maintainable. The procedure of trying the application is provided under Section
capacity of the respondent to pay the
maintenance. Quantum of maintenance was not determined
and the application was dismissed in omnibus manner.
Therefore ... entitled for any maintenance is concerned, it would be
apparent that the applicant has filed the present
maintenance application after getting the decree of divorce
vide order 9.11.2000 set aside the maintenance
order passed by the trial Court and dismissed the
maintenance application of the applicant. Being aggrieved
with ... maintenance application but, keeping silence for one year
by the applicant indicates that being guilty conscious, she
did not file the application for maintenance
parent may lead a normal life.
(4) xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx(not relevant).
5. Application for maintenance.--(1) An
application for maintenance under Section 4 , may be
made ... notice of the application to the children or relative of the
senior citizen. Section 5 (5) provides that an application for
maintenance under Sub Section
maintenance. The
trial court has not properly assessed the evidence available on record
and has committed legal error by allowing the maintenance
application. Therefore ... awarded more than
the claimed maintenance amount, in this respect, the applicants had
filed the maintenance application on 25/04/2006, at that time
maintenance. The
trial court has not properly assessed the evidence available on record
and has committed legal error by allowing the maintenance
application. Therefore ... awarded more than
the claimed maintenance amount, in this respect, the applicants had
filed the maintenance application on 25/04/2006, at that time
petitioner that
after dismissal of application u/s 12 of DV Act, subsequent application for
maintenance ... rejection of
maintenance if the applicant is denied for maintenance from one provision of
law. Furthermore, if the applicant is granted maintenance in distinct provisions
award the maintenance from the date of order and if the maintenance is to be awarded from the date of application, the Court must record ... order, or, if so ordered from the date of the application for maintenance."
Even in the Code of Criminal Procedure
