With respect to an application for maintenance,
ordinarily the maintenance should be awarded from the
date of an application, but with respect to the application ... date of the application for maintenance, as the case may
be. For awarding maintenance from the date of the
application, express order is necessary
application for
maintenance. It is, therefore, open to the Magistrate to
award maintenance from the date of application. The
Court held, and we agree, that ... date of the application for maintenance, as the case may
be. For awarding maintenance from the date of the
application, express order is necessary
would submit that against an order
allowing or rejecting the interim maintenance
application under Proviso to sub section (1) of
Section ... rights of the parties on rejecting or allowing the
interim maintenance application during
proceedings cannot be said to be an interlocutory
order.
17. In view
application under section 125 of
the Cr.P.C. before the Family Court at Bandra and in the said
application she claimed maintenance ... entitled to any maintenance and in fact under the
guise of maintenance for herself, she is actually claiming daughter's
maintenance. It is specifically
proportion in which they would inherit his
property.
5. Application for maintenance.‐ (1) An application for maintenance under section 4 , may be made ... from time to time direct.
(3) On receipt of an application for maintenance under sub‐section (1) after giving notice of the
application
date of the application for maintenance, as the case may
be. For awarding maintenance from the date of the application, express
order is necessary ... date of the application for maintenance,
as the case may be. For awarding maintenance from the date
of the application, express order is necessary
would submit that against an order
allowing or rejecting the interim maintenance
application under Proviso to sub section (1) of
Section ... rights of the parties on rejecting or allowing the
interim maintenance application during
proceedings cannot be said to be an interlocutory
order.
17. In view
numbered as Misc. Application No. 76 of 1980.
In the said application order dated 10-8-1983
for maintenance was passed in favour ... respondent No. 1-wife. Thereafter
second application was filed being Misc.
Application No. 182 of 1986. That application
was allowed
maintenance.
The Courts have not taken into consideration the deduction while
awarding the maintenance. The petitioner has no earning
capacity to pay maintenance awarded ... passed
by the trial Court, it appears that prior to filing application for
maintenance, the respondents therein (petitioner) had filed
respondent would suffer
consequences of contempt apart from dismissal of the maintenance
application whereupon the respondent sought time to think over. On 02 nd
March ... counsel
gave solemn undertaking to this Court to withdraw the maintenance
application filed on behalf of the minor child within two weeks whereupon
this Court
