that the wife is also earning. The reason so
rendered for reduction of maintenance by the Court of Sessions is
as follows:
".... .... ....
15. Admittedly ... maintenance of Rs 23,000 to Rs 20,000 per month as
maintenance to the respondent wife and son.
16. In the result, the maintenance
ORDER
RPFC No.200096/2017 is filed by the husband for
reduction of maintenance amount and RPFC
No.200100/2017 is filed by the wife ... present
revision petitions are filed by the husband/respondent
for reduction of maintenance and the petitioners wife
and daughter for enhancement of maintenance
seeking reduction of maintenance so granted by the
concerned Court at Rs.13,000/-.
2. Facts in briefs which are adumbrated are as
follows ... Writ Petition No.103707/2023 is filed by husband
seeking reduction of maintenance stands rejected on the
reasons rendered in the companion petition.
Ordered accordingly
seeking reduction of maintenance so granted by the
concerned Court at Rs.13,000/-.
2. Facts in briefs which are adumbrated are as
follows ... Writ Petition No.103707/2023 is filed by husband
seeking reduction of maintenance stands rejected on the
reasons rendered in the companion petition.
Ordered accordingly
RPFC No.200001/2017 is filed by the husband for
4
reduction of maintenance amount against the order
dated 22.10.2016 made in Crl.Misc ... respondent/husband who filed RPFC
No.200001/2017 for reduction of maintenance
contended that petitioner No.2 - son attained majority
record did not find any merits in the grounds urged
seeking reduction of maintenance.
12. This Court in the light of the arguments put
forth ... meticulously.
13. This Court does not find any reason whatsoever
for reduction of maintenance amount. In fact, the
maintenance ordered by the trial Magistrate
RPFC
No.11/2015 is filed by the husband for reduction of
maintenance, being aggrieved by the order of
maintenance awarded by the Judge, Additional ... Petitioner - husband in RPFC No.11/2015 is seeking
for reduction of maintenance. It shall also be noted at this
juncture that, the daughter - petitioner
customary or personal law requirement will be considered in the reduction of maintenance rate but cannot annihilate that rate unless it is a reasonable substitute
main matter. The application filed by the
3
petitioner herein for reduction of maintenance has been
dismissed. The petitioner has called in question the legality ... surmises. On
account of the changed circumstances, the maintenance
payable to the respondent requires reduction.
4. On the other hand, respondent, party-in-person
supports
enhancement and husband filed
Crl.R.P. No.36/2015 for reduction of maintenance. The
learned Prl. District & Sessions Judge, Bidar after
hearing both ... husband for reduction
came to be dismissed. Hence, the present revision
6
petition is filed by the husband for reduction of
enhanced maintenance amount granted
