maintenance was earlier rejected by the Court, cannot be a sole ground to reject a subsequent application for maintenance.
5. A learned Single Judge ... therefore she is entitled to claim maintenance even though her application for maintenance as a wife was rejected earlier.
7. The settled position is that
Court was justified in
rejecting the decree of divorce to Nayan ?
(ii) Whether the Family Court was justified in
rejecting maintenance to the Pranita ?
::: Uploaded ... agree with the reason given
by the Family Court while rejecting maintenance to Pranita. We are
::: Uploaded on - 21/01/2021 ::: Downloaded
Court was justified in
rejecting the decree of divorce to Nayan ?
(ii) Whether the Family Court was justified in
rejecting maintenance to the Pranita ?
::: Uploaded ... agree with the reason given
by the Family Court while rejecting maintenance to Pranita. We are
::: Uploaded on - 21/01/2021 ::: Downloaded
Court was justified in
rejecting the decree of divorce to Nayan ?
(ii) Whether the Family Court was justified in
rejecting maintenance to the Pranita ?
::: Uploaded ... agree with the reason given
by the Family Court while rejecting maintenance to Pranita. We are
::: Uploaded on - 21/01/2021 ::: Downloaded
argument that a divorcee would automatically be entitled to claim maintenance was rejected and it was held that Explanation (b) to section 125(1) only ... Code. In the circumstances, the application for maintenance made by the wife was liable to be rejected as not maintainable. Since we have come
rejected holding that application for maintenance was not maintainable against the mother and so the claim for maintenance is rejected, definitely revision under Section ... that order would have amounted to a final order rejecting the claim for maintenance under Section 125 on the ground that the application
Procedure Code ('Code' for short), as the claim of maintenance is rejected by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class at Surat, in Criminal ... opinion shall be sufficient factor in the maintenance proceedings. Application for maintenance came to be rejected by the trial Magistrate for want of proof
claiming maintenance. Her application for maintenance from her husband non-applicant under section 125 Cri.P.C. was rejected by the learned Magistrate ... maintenance. According to her the non-applicant Govinda is having sufficient landed property for providing maintenance and claimed Rs. 400/- per month towards her maintenance
Bhupinder Singh Hooda vs State Of Haryana & Ors on 10 January, 2019
Equivalent citations
Phulbani in C.R.P.
No.62 of 2014 in rejecting prayer for maintenance to petitioner
no.1 with a further prayer to award suitable ... rejecting the maintenance of petitioner no.1 and to
award suitable maintenance in her favour and also for
11
enhancement of the maintenance amount awarded
