The Government Of Tamil Nadu vs Mrs. Muthulakshmi .. Petitioner on 2 March, 2006
that second complaint is not in respect of the same
incident of malfeasance and misfeasance and that it cannot be quashed. The
said decision
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.57 seconds)The Government Of Tamil Nadu, ... vs Mrs. Muthulakshmi And The Joint ... on 2 March, 2006
that second complaint is not in respect of the same incident of malfeasance and misfeasance and that it cannot be quashed. The said decision
Mykala Subbamma vs N. Srinivasa Rao And Ors. on 29 January, 2003
Bengal1 . Therefore, there cannot be any doubt that by their acts of malfeasance and misfeasance, the first respondent and other police constables have committed gross ... wrong doer i.e., the police officer guilty of acts of malfeasance and misfeasance.
44. Mahadev was subjected to unreasonable inhuman and degrading pre-trial
Nimai Barman vs The State Of Assam on 28 February, 2023
that circumstances such as : (i) the period of interval between the malfeasance
and the disclosure; (ii) commonality of the recovered object and its availability
Ram Prasad @ Nanhe Guddoo vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 4 August, 2022
that circumstances such as: (i) the period of
interval between the malfeasance and the
disclosure; (ii) commonality of the recovered
object and its availability
Karuna Shanker vs State Of U.P. on 30 May, 2023
accused and testaments of eyewitnesses to the occurrence of a malfeasance are on record."
24. Learned counsel for the convicts/appellants further argued
Rajan @ Raju vs State Of Kerala Represented By on 4 August, 2009
viewed with suspicion in the absence of any
specific allegation of malfeasance or misfeasance.
18. The other contention raised by the learned counsel is
that
1