daughters of Harishchandra Chauhan. It was
contended that Harishchandra Chauhan as a Malgujar acquired the
land at village-Parsada and by an order dated
suit tank has already been settled in
favour of the ex-malgujar / plaintiffs' ancestors and therefore
it cannot be vested again under the Chhattisgarh
that the owner of this property
was Suket State and its "Malgujar" was "Mandir Math". The
possession of the property
purchased the suit in the year
1940-41 from the erstwhile Malgujar. It was further pleaded
that defendants are in possession of the suit land
purchased the suit in the year
1940-41 from the erstwhile Malgujar. It was further pleaded
that defendants are in possession of the suit land
respect to certain
lands, which were given to his ancestors by the
Malgujars before 1950. It is the case of the petitioner
that the High ... predecessor of the petitioner was granted
certain land by the Malgujar and the petitioner
claims the benefit of land in his favour by virtue
respect
to certain land, which was given to their ancestors by the Malgujars
before 1950. It is the case of petitioner that the High Court ... predecessors of the petitioner were granted certain land by
the Malgujars and the petitioner claims the benefit of land in his favour
by virtue
respect
to certain lands, which were given to his ancestors by the Malgujars
before 1950. It is the case of the petitioner that the High ... predecessor of the petitioner was granted certain land by the
Malgujar and the petitioner claims the benefit of land in his favour by
virtue
respect to certain lands, which were given to his ancestors by the
Malgujars before 1950. It is the case of the petitioner that the High ... predecessor of the petitioner was granted certain land by the
Malgujar and the petitioner claims the benefit of land in his favour by
virtue