Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 566 (1.45 seconds)

Om Prakash vs Chief Secretary on 23 May, 2013

been submitted that his conviction was a result of malicious prosecution. In his criminal appeal, the Honble High Court has suspended the conviction ... conviction was the result of a malicious prosecution. Even if the applicant does not have a criminal background, nevertheless, it is open to the respondents
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. K.M. Agrahari vs Chief Secretary on 19 October, 2011

prosecution case in the Court of Special Judge. According to him, the fact that an employee has been falsely implicated in the criminal case/corruption ... involvement of him in the criminal case, then the prosecution itself has to be termed as malicious. Again, his contention is that the satisfaction
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 7 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Girish H S vs South Western Railway on 29 January, 2026

point made out or finding given that the prosecution, as such, was frivolous, malicious, devoid of merit or wrong and the applicant was completely innocent ... department was responsible for the prosecution or his situation or that his prosecution itself was malicious, and the criminal case was initiated by the department
Central Administrative Tribunal - Bangalore Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Balwan Singh vs M/O Defence on 3 September, 2024

endeavoured to distinguish the prosecution launched by the police for involvement of an employee in a criminal case and the criminal proceedings initiated ... acquittal of the person by a criminal Court, unless it is found that the prosecution is malicious." 25 OA No.1622 /2021 Court
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next