required to be done" covers prohibitory as well as mandatory
injunctions.]"
3
6. It is evident from Sub-rule (1) of Rule ... rule (5) of Rule 32 on
the language used applies to mandatory injunctions only. The word 'injunction'
under Sub-rule (5) has been
Recovery of
Money of Rs.4,99,880/ and for Mandatory Injunctions (hereinafter
referred to as CS No.408/2017). However, the relief of Mandatory ... defendant No.2 i.e. Arun
Arora for Permanent and Mandatory Injunctions (hereinafter re
ferred to as CS No.407/2017). In this suit
Recovery of
Money of Rs.4,99,880/ and for Mandatory Injunctions (hereinafter
referred to as CS No.408/2017). However, the relief of Mandatory ... defendant No.2 i.e. Arun
Arora for Permanent and Mandatory Injunctions (hereinafter re
ferred to as CS No.407/2017). In this suit
Recovery of
Money of Rs.4,99,880/ and for Mandatory Injunctions (hereinafter
referred to as CS No.408/2017). However, the relief of Mandatory ... defendant No.2 i.e. Arun
Arora for Permanent and Mandatory Injunctions (hereinafter re
ferred to as CS No.407/2017). In this suit
Part-III, New Delhi. ..... Defendant.
SUIT FOR POSSESSION, PERMANENT PROHIBITORY AND
MANDATORY INJUNCTIONS, DAMAGES AND MESNE
PROFITS.
Date of Institution : 28.01.2011
Date on which arguments ... COUNTER CLAIM FOR DECLARATION, CANCELLATION AND
MANDATORY INJUNCTIONS.
Date of Institution : 27.04.2011
Date on which arguments concluded : 03.03.2025
Date of Judgment : 29.03.2025
Result : Partly Decreed
Part-III, New Delhi. ..... Defendant.
SUIT FOR POSSESSION, PERMANENT PROHIBITORY AND
MANDATORY INJUNCTIONS, DAMAGES AND MESNE
PROFITS.
Date of Institution : 28.01.2011
Date on which arguments ... COUNTER CLAIM FOR DECLARATION, CANCELLATION AND
MANDATORY INJUNCTIONS.
Date of Institution : 27.04.2011
Date on which arguments concluded : 03.03.2025
Date of Judgment : 29.03.2025
Result : Partly Decreed
plaintiff has also prayed for a decree of permanent
and mandatory injunctions restraining the defendants, their agents etc.
Suit No. 221/14 (Old Suit ... present suit for Declaration alongwith the relief of the Permanent and
Mandatory Injunctions is maintainable because the plaintiff is not the
executant of the said
respondent)
Findings:
The Claimant has sought the reliefs of mandatory injunctions
directing (i) the Respondent to transfer the shop in his favour ... Claimant is entitled to seek both these reliefs of
mandatory injunctions against the Respondent. The issue is accordingly
decided in favour of the Claimant
defendant.
JUDGMENT: -
1. This is a suit for permanent and mandatory injunctions
and recovery of Rs. 9,23,700/- along with interest and cost ... notice as illegal in the guise of permanent and
mandatory injunctions and hence the suit was not maintainable.
He did not give notice
Ishwar Nagar, Delhi .....Defendants
SUIT FOR DECLARATION, RESTITUTION OF PROPERTY,
MANDATORY INJUNCTIONS AND DAMAGES
Suit first filed on (with deficient court fees/ objections) : 31.05.1991
Suit ... purposes of section 22 , Limitation
Act.
12. Plaintiff next claims several mandatory injunctions. These reliefs
are again time barred. Plaintiff had knowledge of alleged wrongful
