execution of the decree insofar as the reliefs of mandatory injunctions.
The JDrs filed their counter in the EP and contended that ... Indian Limitation Act,
1963 , for execution of decrees for mandatory injunctions. The executing Court
took the view that the decree of the trial Court
case, it is
held that the relief of interlocutory mandatory injunctions are granted
generally to preserve or restore the status quo of the last ... parte interim injunctions are in effect in the nature of
interim mandatory injunctions, which cannot be granted in a suit
Rule 32 (5) to prohibitory injunctions also and not merely to mandatory injunctions, and are preferable ones as they give the same meaning ... covers both prohibitory and mandatory injunction. There is nothing peculiar in the added Sub-rule (5) referring only to mandatory injunctions.
5. The second objection
required to be done" covers prohibitory as well as mandatory
injunctions.]"
3
6. It is evident from Sub-rule (1) of Rule ... rule (5) of Rule 32 on
the language used applies to mandatory injunctions only. The word 'injunction'
under Sub-rule (5) has been
Rule 32(5) to prohibitory injunctions also and not merely to mandatory injunctions and are preferable ones as they give the same meaning ... covers both prohibitory and mandatory injunction. There is nothing peculiar in the added Sub-rule (5) referring only to mandatory injunctions.
5. The second objection
plaintiff has also prayed for a decree of permanent
and mandatory injunctions restraining the defendants, their agents etc.
Suit No. 221/14 (Old Suit ... present suit for Declaration alongwith the relief of the Permanent and
Mandatory Injunctions is maintainable because the plaintiff is not the
executant of the said
Ishwar Nagar, Delhi .....Defendants
SUIT FOR DECLARATION, RESTITUTION OF PROPERTY,
MANDATORY INJUNCTIONS AND DAMAGES
Suit first filed on (with deficient court fees/ objections) : 31.05.1991
Suit ... purposes of section 22 , Limitation
Act.
12. Plaintiff next claims several mandatory injunctions. These reliefs
are again time barred. Plaintiff had knowledge of alleged wrongful
Ishwar Nagar, Delhi .....Defendants
SUIT FOR DECLARATION, RESTITUTION OF PROPERTY,
MANDATORY INJUNCTIONS AND DAMAGES
Suit filed on : 08.07.1991
Judgment pronounced on : 31.10.2018
JUDGMENT ... purposes of
section 22 , Limitation Act.
12. Plaintiff next claims several mandatory injunctions. These
reliefs are again time barred. Plaintiff had knowledge of alleged
wrongful
reserved: 02.04.2012
Date of decision : 19.04.2012
SUIT FOR POSSESSION, PERMANENT AND MANDATORY INJUNCTIONS AND
MESNE PROFITS.
JUDGMENT
The facts in brief, necessary for the disposal ... plaint, the plaintiff
has prayed for a decree of permanent and mandatory injunctions restraining the
defendant no.1 and her agents etc. from creating
small extent of property from the respondent herein and for injunctions, both permanent and mandatory. The appellant and the respondent are adjacent owners ... English decisions are favourably inclined in the matter of granting mandatory injunctions when the unlawful act does not merely obstruct proper enjoyment of plaintiff
