defendants for the relief of Specific Performance of
Contract, permanent and mandatory injunctions.
2. It is the case of the plaintiff that the
defendants ... Hence, the plaintiff's suit for specific
performance, permanent and mandatory injunctions is
not maintainable. The Civil Court has no jurisdiction to
entertain
defendants for the relief of Specific Performance of
Contract, permanent and mandatory injunctions.
2. It is the case of the plaintiff that the
defendants ... 2013
the plaintiff's suit for specific performance, permanent
and mandatory injunctions is not maintainable.
30. Plaintiff contended that the plaintiff filed the
present
3116/2015
Suit for permanent
Nature of suit : and mandatory
injunctions
Date of commencement of : 06.09.2018
evidence
Date on which the : 08.10.2021
judgment is pronounced ... schedule property, but
has filed the present suit for permanent and
mandatory injunctions but has not sought for the
relief of possession. In a decision
suit
Suit for declaration,
Nature of suit : Permanent and Mandatory
Injunctions.
/3/ O.S.No.4101/2013
Date of commencement of
evidence : 04.01.2016
Date ... suit
against the defendants for the relief of declaration,
permanent and mandatory injunctions.
12. In order to establish his case, plaintiff
himself examined
Application are not
ordinary restraints, but are in the nature of mandatory injunctions.
Prayer (a) of the Suit is only for a declaration. Now prayers ... right in my reading that prayers are in the nature of
mandatory injunctions, then certain consequences follow. Even if I
am not, the settled
suit : 30.07.2012
Suit for permanent and
Nature of suit : mandatory injunctions
Date of commencement of
evidence : 09.01.2020
Date on which the judgment
is pronounced ... encroachment.
22. Plaintiffs have filed the present suit for
permanent and mandatory injunctions, thereby claiming
the easementary rights. It is well settled law that
suit : 02.05.2013
Suit for permanent and
Nature of suit : mandatory injunctions
Date of commencement of
evidence : 27.01.2014
Date on which the judgment
is pronounced ... this case.
Plaintiff has filed the present suit for permanent and
mandatory injunctions, thereby claiming the
easementary rights. It is well settled law that
having power to issue the
12 O.S.No.2838/2018
mandatory injunctions. The text part of the said provision
is as under:
Section ... seek mandatory injunction to demolish the said illegal
constructions. Therefore, as per the above said provisions,
this court is inclined to grant mandatory injunctions
Recovery of
Money of Rs.4,99,880/ and for Mandatory Injunctions (hereinafter
referred to as CS No.408/2017). However, the relief of Mandatory ... defendant No.2 i.e. Arun
Arora for Permanent and Mandatory Injunctions (hereinafter re
ferred to as CS No.407/2017). In this suit
Recovery of
Money of Rs.4,99,880/ and for Mandatory Injunctions (hereinafter
referred to as CS No.408/2017). However, the relief of Mandatory ... defendant No.2 i.e. Arun
Arora for Permanent and Mandatory Injunctions (hereinafter re
ferred to as CS No.407/2017). In this suit
