sold a defective car to the
Respondent-Complainant with inherent manufacturing defects which could not be
repaired and on which he had to spend over ... however, as already been observed the manufacturer, i.e. O.P. No.2
evidently admitted the manufacturing defects of the car which ultimately
prompted
view that onus shifts to
the manufacturer to show that the vehicle does not suffer from manufacturing
defect once complainant has proved and discharged ... drawn than that the vehicle
suffers from manufacturing defect as defects which are not of manufacturing
nature can be rectified or removed without their recurrence
Locomotives
Company, Jamshedpur respectively) guilty of supplying a truck with
manufacturing defects to the purchaser, Bachchi Ram Dangwal, original
complainant (respondent no.1 in this ... warranty period, the complainant concluded that
the truck suffered from manufacturing defects. Since the problems with the
truck were not resolved satisfactorily
input. The manufacturing defect is much more than an ordinary defect which can be cured by replacing the defective part. Manufacturing defect is fundamental basic ... functionaries and authorities of the opposite party-manufacturing company, it will not by itself amount manufacturing defect.
The car was sold to the complainant
fault in the
nozzles and FIP. Rather there was some manufacturing defects which lead to low pick
up and engine heat up.
6. The respondent ... became quite evident
that the vehicle in question suffered from major manufacturing defect and appellants
have failed to detect this major defect. The said vehicle
liability imposed on manufacturer and dealer- Manufacturer absolved in appeal- Entire liability fixed on dealer- Hence revision- Onus to prove manufacturing defect lies on complainant ... expert evidence produced to prove manufacturing defect in vehicle- Alleged defects cannot be termed as manufacturing defect - Vehicle repeatedly brought to service station for repairs
contract between
the complainant and the
petitioner/manufacturer. Again, the complaint is conspicuously silent about
any manufacturing defect.
11. It was contended that manufacturing defect ... results in a complete and total breakdown.
The manufacturer is liable only in case of manufacturing defect.
The complainant
has filed service history
complaint, saying that there was no credible and
adequate evidence for manufacturing defect in the vehicle. An appeal was filed against the said order ... thoroughly examine the vehicle for rectification of any defect or fault,
manufacturing defect or whatever so that the vehicle becomes operational to the
perfect satisfaction
sold a defective car to the
Respondent-Complainant with inherent manufacturing defects which could not be
repaired and on which he had to spend over ... however, as already been observed the manufacturer, i.e. O.P. No.2
evidently admitted the manufacturing defects of the car which ultimately
prompted
were changed but there was no total improvement.
3. Thus, alleging manufacturing defects, complainant filed a complaint before the District Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, Junagadh ... carried out by the dealer. The defects cannot be termed as manufacturing defects. The car was duly attended at the workshop by the dealer
