petitioner was done in respect of multiple joints
and therefore the margin of error was significantly on the lower side.
In this regard, the learned ... within a margin of one year.
It also provides that the correct method in such cases is to allow a
margin of error
Signing Date:03.07.2024
11:48:43
(ii) Whether the principle of „margin of error‟ is to be
applicable or not in cases under the POCSO ... should be construed as 20 years on the premise that further
margin of error of two years has to be given. In alternate
2003 decided on 25.07.2003) where in such cases,
this Court reduced margin of error in ascertaining the age to six months on
either side ... with certainty
because it is considered an inexact science where the margin of error can
be 2 or 3 years on either side. Relying
claim of Petitioner that the equipment had a possible
maximum margin error of +/- 0.005% and the result of Petitioner was
0.004% which is squarely covered ... this Court is not inclined to grant benefit of
maximum margin error to the Petitioner. The reason for not granting
benefit of margin of error
court for assessment of age
of the prosecutrix of two years margin of error on the higher side was
erroneous. It is therefore, stated that ... victim between 16-18 years.
Therefore, applying the margin error principle of two years on either
side, the age could be between 14-20 years
Right to
Information Act , CRCL had responded that there was a margin of
error of +/- 0.25% in testing of gold dore bars through the test ... testedwith a purity of more than 95% but were within the margin of
error i.e., 95.10%, 95.26% and 95.17%.Learned senior counsel for
respondent
method called Greulich & Pyle
(GP method) in which a margin of error could be +/- two (2) years. The
respondents have also relied upon ... 2013 Page 9 of 18
error free. Even TW3 method, which the respondents have adopted,
admittedly has error margin of +/- by six months
several
decisions, has taken judicial notice of the fact that the margin of error
in age ascertained by radiological examination is two years on either ... estimated the age as 17 to 19 years. So applying the margin of error
principle, of two years on either side, the age could
prosecutrix was assessed between 14 to 16 years, with no further
marginal error to be given either side. The said ossification report, proved
on record
electronic meter and found it to be within the permissible error margin i.e. 0.01%. It is stated by the respondent that it is bound
